You have worked through the entire audiobook list? I just visited and saw David adding some things, so I got out, afraid it would mess him up. But I got this much information:TriciaG wrote: ↑April 12th, 2022, 4:55 pmBeats me. I haven't come up with a workable suggestion.Next question is how do we keep it current?
I've worked through the audiobook list, added LV links on the lines where there was a Wikipedia link (except for LOTE wiki pages, and Bible books, and maybe a couple other exceptions), and added a few lines of more recently cataloged works that were part of a series or were a Version X of something already linked.
And I put "yes" on ones that already had links on the Wikipedia pages, added by someone else.
I did not add my name to every line I edited. I did add several notes to various project lines, if there were warnings on the Wikipedia page about not adding more external links, or for whatever reason something should be noted.
Lines that were questionable, I left the Yes/No field blank. Ones that for whatever shouldn't get a LV link, I put "no" with a note.
I found it surprising that many formerly valid Wikipedia pages are no longer existent. I guess they're not kidding with those warning messages that say that a page may be deleted if it isn't improved!
And like the author list, I am not sure how to keep the audiobook one current.
There are 15,577 lines filled in, presumably one for each book. But the home page reports 16,623 completed projects. That's a difference of 1046 titles.
The book numbers range from 47 - 17,558.
There are lots of numbers missing in this sequence, blanks are scattered throughout, but are more toward the end than the beginning. For example, just in the 17000's, there are only 5 #'s:
17072, 17089, 17125, 17218, 17558. Huge gaps between them. I don't know how to explain this.
I don't know how the numbers are assigned -- I presume the computer does this automtically.
So our problems are threefold:
1. Understanding the system.
2. Catching it up.
3. Keeping it up.
At this point I don't think it is feasible to aim for perfection or completeness. Every link we successfully add is a plus.
I would like to see BC's encouraged to add whatever links are associated with their project when it catalogues, and report them here. It's just one more logical step in the process, and the instructions are right there for them to follow.