To my horror I discovered that I hadn't saved the edited versions of these, so I've just had to do them again <grr>. This means that the timestamps might not be quite the same.
I've redone the whole intro for Section 7, so that it flowed.
New lengths are 18:12 for secton 7 and 16:28 for Section 16.
Oh, totally NOT necessary.
You can always download them from the MW, and I save copies of all files for my DPL projects.
Well, if you've done totally new recordings, I'll need to do a complete PL on them.
I've got them in my queue.
To my horror I discovered that I hadn't saved the edited versions of these, so I've just had to do them again <grr>. This means that the timestamps might not be quite the same.
I've redone the whole intro for Section 7, so that it flowed.
New lengths are 18:12 for secton 7 and 16:28 for Section 16.
Oh, totally NOT necessary.
You can always download them from the MW, and I save copies of all files for my DPL projects.
Well, if you've done totally new recordings, I'll need to do a complete PL on them.
I've got them in my queue.
Oh, no, no, no. I meant I had to edit them again—not do new recordings. All of my repeats, flubs and clicks were back in. I just had to take them out again.
Because of the Loudness and Noise control I need to do after recording, I find it best to work on the aud files rather than the final mp3 files.
"Just because you can doesn't mean you should"—my first law of life.
Beeswaxcandle wrote: ↑October 31st, 2022, 11:19 pm
Oh, no, no, no. I meant I had to edit them again—not do new recordings. All of my repeats, flubs and clicks were back in. I just had to take them out again.
Because of the Loudness and Noise control I need to do after recording, I find it best to work on the aud files rather than the final mp3 files.
I see. Well, they still need a complete PL, which I'm glad to do, so thanks for letting me know. I really enjoy listening to your reading, and these are great chapters.
drandall wrote: ↑November 1st, 2022, 3:13 pm
I am sorry I am withdrawing from this project. I am working on another project that is longer than anticipated.
Beeswaxcandle wrote: ↑November 1st, 2022, 11:52 pm
I'm happy to pick up the above two dropped sections.
To my horror I discovered that I hadn't saved the edited versions of these, so I've just had to do them again <grr>. This means that the timestamps might not be quite the same.
I've redone the whole intro for Section 7, so that it flowed.
New lengths are 18:12 for secton 7 and 16:28 for Section 16.
Normally I don't comment on pronunciation, but the name of John Wesley's friend, George Whitefield, is so well known, that I thought it worth mentioning. The last name is Whit-field, despite the spelling of "White." Don't ask me why. It is like the famous English Poet William Cowper, who is pronounced Cooper. I said that wrong for a long time. Or, the River Thames.
Here are the times right at the end where I heard Whitefield: 20:09, 20:31, 21:09
Normally I don't comment on pronunciation, but the name of John Wesley's friend, George Whitefield, is so well known, that I thought it worth mentioning. The last name is Whit-field, despite the spelling of "White." Don't ask me why. It is like the famous English Poet William Cowper, who is pronounced Cooper. I said that wrong for a long time. Or, the River Thames.
Here are the times right at the end where I heard Whitefield: 20:09, 20:31, 21:09
It never dawned on me that Whitefield would be pronounced any other way. I guess I should have expected it from how other names are pronounced, e.g., sinjin for St. John. Anyway, here is the corrected file:
mleigh wrote: ↑November 5th, 2022, 5:46 pm
It never dawned on me that Whitefield would be pronounced any other way. I guess I should have expected it from how other names are pronounced, e.g., sinjin for St. John. Anyway, here is the corrected file:
Or, the River Thames.
