neecheelok70 wrote: ↑January 7th, 2022, 2:14 pm
Thanks, David. My apologies. I should have said you needed to omit the footnote numbers if you were not going to provide the notes. Alone, they do nothing for the reader. So if you think these notes are important, the instructions say only don't do the notes if the information is not worthwhile. There are instructions also for including the footnotes. I don't know if you want to go back to check the notes or not; that I will leave up to you. Your intro space is a little over 1 second and the end is still too long. Also the missing text at 21:28 is still missing. Oh, sorry, somehow I didn't see your statement to cancel. Jim
A few more glitches resolved.
No, I agree, there was no referenced information in the footnotes so pointless.
I've lessened the silences at start and end more so.
The missing text is definitely there and is to be found at 23m40s
Another apology. I was looking for the text according to my original time point, which of course is crazy because you had added that whole section at the beginning, which turned it all around, so to speak. Anyway, we are on target now. And you are PL OK. Thanks, Jim
neecheelok70 wrote: ↑January 7th, 2022, 3:54 pm
Another apology. I was looking for the text according to my original time point, which of course is crazy because you had added that whole section at the beginning, which turned it all around, so to speak. Anyway, we are on target now. And you are PL OK. Thanks, Jim
