(Complete) The Poems of Gerard Manley Hopkins - m8b1
-
- Posts: 534
- Joined: April 27th, 2012, 1:10 am
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Some more uploaded. Just a few final corrections to do now, which I'll do this week.
-
- Posts: 534
- Joined: April 27th, 2012, 1:10 am
- Location: UK
- Contact:
All done and ready for final PL. The last few in the book tail off a bit in quality, I think, so if you want the best effect I'd save No 4, The Wreck, till last.
I'm back from the briefest of vacations that turned into an illness. I'll catch up as fast as I can. I'm sorry to hear about the problems with the texts. Hopkins deserves better, doesn't he? I wonder if both texts used should be linked in the cataloging.
My LibriVox: https://librivox.org/sections/readers/13278
-
- Posts: 534
- Joined: April 27th, 2012, 1:10 am
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Happy to take advice on that. Maybe refer to Bartleby for 73 and 74 only? Sorry to hear you've been ill.
35 PL OK!
There are discrepancies in 36 (The Leaden Echo and the Golden Echo.) At 1:00, there is a line missing: 'No there's none...' At 4:15 or so you read 'but an eyelash, but the least lash...' but the archive text reads 'not an eyelash, not the least lash...' (Or am I mishearing?)
There are discrepancies in 36 (The Leaden Echo and the Golden Echo.) At 1:00, there is a line missing: 'No there's none...' At 4:15 or so you read 'but an eyelash, but the least lash...' but the archive text reads 'not an eyelash, not the least lash...' (Or am I mishearing?)
My LibriVox: https://librivox.org/sections/readers/13278
37 and 38 PL OK!
39. At 1:31 or so you add a word. The line is "Were I come" rather than "Were I to come."
39. At 1:31 or so you add a word. The line is "Were I come" rather than "Were I to come."
My LibriVox: https://librivox.org/sections/readers/13278
40-48 PL OK!
49. Is not the brother's name pronounced differently?
49. Is not the brother's name pronounced differently?
My LibriVox: https://librivox.org/sections/readers/13278
-
- Posts: 534
- Joined: April 27th, 2012, 1:10 am
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Many thanks for that!
I've corrected the last line in 39, and have re-uploaded for spot PL. I'll fix 36 and 49 shortly.
In 36, I do read "not an eyelash, not the least lash...". Think that may just be some oddity in my British accent!
I've corrected the last line in 39, and have re-uploaded for spot PL. I'll fix 36 and 49 shortly.
In 36, I do read "not an eyelash, not the least lash...". Think that may just be some oddity in my British accent!
You have an accent?!MichaelMaggs wrote: ↑June 16th, 2020, 7:18 am Many thanks for that!
I've corrected the last line in 39, and have re-uploaded for spot PL. I'll fix 36 and 49 shortly.
In 36, I do read "not an eyelash, not the least lash...". Think that may just be some oddity in my British accent!
My LibriVox: https://librivox.org/sections/readers/13278
-
- Posts: 534
- Joined: April 27th, 2012, 1:10 am
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Haha! Your accent is lovely. It makes my reading of Hopkins sound pretty hollow in comparison.
My LibriVox: https://librivox.org/sections/readers/13278
54-57 and 59-63 PL OK!
For 64, it's a small thing perhaps, but I hear three syllables in the first two 'words.' I assume they are to be 'tee-vo, chee-vo.'
For 64, it's a small thing perhaps, but I hear three syllables in the first two 'words.' I assume they are to be 'tee-vo, chee-vo.'
My LibriVox: https://librivox.org/sections/readers/13278
65-71 PL OK!
72. At 3:58 or so, the wording is '... longer leaving it to float.'
72. At 3:58 or so, the wording is '... longer leaving it to float.'
My LibriVox: https://librivox.org/sections/readers/13278