Ligeti_Grieg wrote: ↑April 15th, 2024, 3:09 am
Hello,
I need a response, so I can make the appropriate edits.
Hi - these comments don't apply to my DPL notes. I'll keep an eye on this project for when you are able to address those items. - Betsy
Looks like annise addressed them so we’e just waiting for the other corrections.
Cheers,
Hi Winnifred - Okay. It seems that Annise is covering what's needed to be done. I'm a bit confused - so I think I'll back off this project. Unless you still need me. But I'll need a bit of guidance if you do. - Betsy
No need to back off. Annise responded only to my questions about the intro/outro.
I’ll be spot PLing just the first three sections when corrections come in and you’ve got all the rest. The reader is busy with paid work right now, so that’s why it’s taken so long.
Winnifred wrote: ↑April 25th, 2024, 12:55 pm
No need to back off. Annise responded only to my questions about the intro/outro.
I’ll be spot PLing just the first three sections when corrections come in and you’ve got all the rest. The reader is busy with paid work right now, so that’s why it’s taken so long.
Cheers,
Okay - thanks for this reply. I just got confused about the status. But, yes, am still waiting for fixes on the few sections I've marked. No hurry. Just wonderin' !! - Betsy
annise wrote: ↑May 7th, 2024, 5:26 pm
Section 3 has a bitrate of 320 and will need to be fixed before it can be catalogued , Anne
My apologies for missing that. I think I ran it through Checker when it first came in and neglected to do it again for the corrected file. I've marked this in the MW and put it back to See PL notes.
It happens, especially when files were recorded with different values, and then something needs changing. That's why we have a validation step before it's catalogued . If everything was always correct it would be a waste of time
. If everything was always correct it would be a waste of time