[COMPLETE] Arrows of Freethought by G. W. Foote - availle

pyledriver · Post by **pyledriver** » January 22nd, 2023, 2:10 pm

knotyouraveragejo wrote: ↑January 19th, 2023, 5:20 pm Section 21 - Nice reading! A couple of minor optional changes if you want to make them - none of them change the meaning significantly.

@2:41 don't go in yet - text is "don't go yet"
@2:59 Plenty of strong collecting boxes - text is "plenty of good strong collecting boxes"
@6:02 not to the young man - text is "not to the young gentleman"

I'm of the opinion that they are fine as is.

January 22nd, 2023, 2:31 pm

OK, will mark this as PL OK.

Post by **Availle** » January 22nd, 2023, 6:00 pm

Thanks for helping out Jo!

Section 20 is also PL OK!

nbvoices · Post by **nbvoices** » January 25th, 2023, 9:45 am

knotyouraveragejo wrote: ↑January 22nd, 2023, 11:21 am Section 18 - very nice reading!

I have only one note and it is optional since it is obvious from the context

@11:03 text is Satan - I hear "Saintant"

"Hi, I will check this out and correct soon. thanks. Nancy "

nbvoices · Post by **nbvoices** » January 25th, 2023, 11:46 am

nbvoices wrote: ↑January 25th, 2023, 9:45 am
knotyouraveragejo wrote: ↑January 22nd, 2023, 11:21 am Section 18 - very nice reading!

I have only one note and it is optional since it is obvious from the context

@11:03 text is Satan - I hear "Saintant"
"Hi, I will check this out and correct soon. thanks. Nancy "

Hello again, give this a try and let me know if it passes the 't' test....

https://librivox.org/uploads/availle/arrowsoffreethought_18_foote_128kb.mp3

January 25th, 2023, 8:59 pm

Thanks Nancy. Section 18 PL OK.

February 3rd, 2023, 3:27 pm

Section 15 and section 16 are both PL OK!

February 3rd, 2023, 3:52 pm

PL Notes for section 13 -

@1:21 "of a discourse" I heard "of a disclosure"
@2:12 "that a parson" I heard "that a person"
@6:36 "and ever body" I heard "every"
@6:44 "ignominious" https://www.dictionary.com/browse/ignominious
@7:27 "not one of degree, but of kind" I heard "not one degree, but of a kind"

Post by **Availle** » February 3rd, 2023, 6:15 pm

Thank you Jo! Much appreciated!

February 4th, 2023, 4:11 pm

PL notes for section 12:

00:13 Archbishopric (I heard Archbishopry)
1:56 confidently (heard condently?)
2:34 numbers (heard numerous)
3:08 The whole of their posterity (heard prosperity)
3:34 retrogression (heard regression)
4:31 missed edit "play" before palaces
6:29 Atheism (heard atheim?)
10:43 Missing "which" before "your so-called science"
13:20 The archbishop (heard the bishop)
15:42 sweetest fountains (heard foundations?)

65tux · Post by **65tux** » February 4th, 2023, 6:39 pm

Section 13 PL notes corrected. https://librivox.org/uploads/availle/arrowsoffreethought_13_foote_128kb.mp3

Post by **Availle** » February 4th, 2023, 7:46 pm

Thank you both!

I've listened to sections 5 and 14 - both are PL OK!

A quick note went out to Dean regarding his PL notes.

February 4th, 2023, 10:52 pm

65tux wrote: ↑February 4th, 2023, 6:39 pm Section 13 PL notes corrected. https://librivox.org/uploads/availle/arrowsoffreethought_13_foote_128kb.mp3

PL OK!

65tux · Post by **65tux** » February 5th, 2023, 9:51 am

Section 12 PL notes corrected, with two notes, uploaded at https://librivox.org/uploads/availle/arrowsoffreethought_12_foote_128kb.mp3

I definitely hear "confidently" at 1:56
I did not correct "thought that numerous of our intelligent mechanics" as changing "numerous" to "numbers" would not change the intent or meaning of the sentence.

February 5th, 2023, 10:50 am

Section 12 PL OK!