COMPLETE: Oscar Wilde: The Complete Interviews - jo

[Dulcamara]

Hello, RobMarland and KevinS.

I've just dropped by to say a big THANK YOU to you both for your work on this amazing project.

I SO look forward to its completion!

[KevinS]

Hello, RobMarland and KevinS.

I've just dropped by to say a big THANK YOU to you both for your work on this amazing project.

I SO look forward to its completion!

Rob is doing all the work. He's doing a fine, fine job, too!

[RobMarland]

——-

[RobMarland]

——-

[RobMarland]

——-

[KevinS]

Hi Kevin,

Thanks. For some of the interviews, after recording I have found versions that were printed earlier and sometimes with more information. In those cases I have discarded my first recording and done another one. Of course, it is not ideal for me to ask for PL and then discard the recording, as I don’t want to waste your time, so where I have evidence that the version I have found is a reprint I have delayed recording it in hopes of finding the original. But sometimes it is not clear that an article is a reprint until I turn up an older version by chance.

There will also be occasions where the same section number is PLed twice because I have moved the sections around.

Rob, I won't know that sections have been moved about without your telling me. I use the MW to guide my PLing.

In truth, I'm confused by what has happened with Section 142. Did you re-record the entire section? It is a new section?

I don't mind terribly, but this fluid means of arranging sections is rather hard to track.

[RobMarland]

——-

[KevinS]

Hi Kevin,

I have had another look at my upload from early in the month. It seems I typed 142 but I meant 145.

I would not worry about the section numbers from last year (e.g. the 142 that Sean PLed that you quote), because they will be different now, after rearrangements.

Obviously it's a pain if I make a typo in the thread, but in general the rearrangements should not affect you because I only move sections about when it does not affect the numbering of files that are still to be PLed as OK.

Oh, I see. All is well then! (Please don't feel as though I am complaining; I'm enjoying the project!)

[RobMarland]

——-

[RobMarland]

——-

[KevinS]

For PL:

100: https://librivox.org/uploads/knotyouraveragejo/wildeints_18820527_manwt_128kb.mp3
138: https://librivox.org/uploads/knotyouraveragejo/wildeints_18820902_phitim_128kb.mp3
168: https://librivox.org/uploads/knotyouraveragejo/wildeints_18830812_nyt_128kb.mp3
169: https://librivox.org/uploads/knotyouraveragejo/wildeints_18830818_nymir_128kb.mp3
170: https://librivox.org/uploads/knotyouraveragejo/wildeints_18830822_cio_128kb.mp3
171: https://librivox.org/uploads/knotyouraveragejo/wildeints_18830822_phipre_128kb.mp3
173: https://librivox.org/uploads/knotyouraveragejo/wildeints_18830830_chanc_128kb.mp3

I'm getting behind again!

[RobMarland]

——-

[KevinS]

fyi, Kevin, I have deleted the to-be-PLed section 204 (“Art in Chicago,” The Chicago Daily Tribune (Chicago, IL), 19 Feb. 1882, 16 https://librivox.org/uploads/knotyouraveragejo/wildeints_18820219_chitri_128kb.mp3) because my research indicates that this is not an original interview and instead only quotes a previous interview.

I have edited the post above to highlight that the file should not be PLed.

Okay. Thank you!

I will catch up with the rest soon.

[knotyouraveragejo]

Hi Rob,

We are going on 2 years with this project. Maybe time to think about wrapping it up? You can always start a Vol 2 down the road if you are still looking for sources.

[RobMarland]

——-