Here is my file with the edits you had mentioned. Please do let me know if there is something else I need to take care of for this section to be pl okay.
Here is my file with the edits you had mentioned. Please do let me know if there is something else I need to take care of for this section to be pl okay.
Here is my file with the edits you had mentioned. Please do let me know if there is something else I need to take care of for this section to be pl okay.
Almost there, but the repeat, "the green knows how to be gay - the green knows how to be grave" is still there at 12:50 - 12:54.
Here is my file with the edits you had mentioned. Please do let me know if there is something else I need to take care of for this section to be pl okay.
Almost there, but the repeat, "the green knows how to be gay - the green knows how to be grave" is still there at 12:50 - 12:54.
Okay, I must admit to being a touch confounded here.
This is the text, pg. 164, : Oh, yes, the Green knows how to be gay ; but the Green knows how to be grave. "
That is what I hear when I listen to my audio.
Do you not hear the same?
Here is my file with the edits you had mentioned. Please do let me know if there is something else I need to take care of for this section to be pl okay.
Almost there, but the repeat, "the green knows how to be gay - the green knows how to be grave" is still there at 12:50 - 12:54.
Okay, I must admit to being a touch confounded here.
This is the text, pg. 164, : Oh, yes, the Green knows how to be gay ; but the Green knows how to be grave. "
That is what I hear when I listen to my audio.
Do you not hear the same?
Ah, yes, my mistake!
You are just fine, then. Sorry for the muddy waters.
Almost there, but the repeat, "the green knows how to be gay - the green knows how to be grave" is still there at 12:50 - 12:54.
Okay, I must admit to being a touch confounded here.
This is the text, pg. 164, : Oh, yes, the Green knows how to be gay ; but the Green knows how to be grave. "
That is what I hear when I listen to my audio.
Do you not hear the same?
Ah, yes, my mistake!
You are just fine, then. Sorry for the muddy waters.
Section 17 submitted. Note: recording was 85+db so I normalized, which increased to 90.1. Still learning audacity -- if there was a way to only slightly increase, I am not aware yet but would be happy to tweek, if desired.
90 dB is just fine. Almost ideal, in fact. Although 89 is the ideal, anything between 86 and 92 is great! I'll also do a slight volume adjustment to all files that need them in the final step before cataloguing.
As soon as Larry is able to PL this recording, we can get this book to the catalogue, if all is well. I can already confirm that the tech is all good here, including volume.
BeckyWTX wrote: ↑January 5th, 2021, 4:36 pm
Section 17 submitted. Note: recording was 85+db so I normalized, which increased to 90.1. Still learning audacity -- if there was a way to only slightly increase, I am not aware yet but would be happy to tweek, if desired.
Thank you Silverquill and MightyFelix -- I realized after I had submitted that I had forgotten to check my seconds of silence on both ends! Thanks for forgiving the over-run!
Looking forward to listening to the entire book.
BeckyWTX