[COMPLETE] Selected Poems from Michelangelo Buonarroti - tg

[Iunta4Ios]

If he's painting frescos in heaven, we definitely don't want to end up in Dante's Inferno on some celestial wall!

Michael

Pier

[Eysiss]

Now fo the first PL of this huge amount of Mr Buonarroti!
May he look at me with grace and not paint mee as an ugly old woman!

Pier
Section 4 is almost perfect.
2 remarks:

at 1:56 XIV : "Qui vuol mie sorti" instead of "Qui vuol mie sorte"
At XXXV and XLIII the last 2 epitaffi, at the beginning of XXXV and in the middle of XLIII I hear something in the background.
It's not so disturbing, but its noticeable.
Please check if you'd like to change that.

Cheers
Emanuela

[Eysiss]

Section 7

0:27 3rd line "virtude" instead of "virtute"

Emanuela

[Eysiss]

Section 8

is PL OK

Emanuela

[Iunta4Ios]

Thanks Emanuela,
I was sure I could well confy on your careful attention!
I'll revise as soon as possible.
Pier

[Iunta4Ios]

Now fo the first PL of this huge amount of Mr Buonarroti!
May he look at me with grace and not paint mee as an ugly old woman!

Cheers
Emanuela

I uploaded the revised versions of sections 4 and 7:
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/selectedpoems_004_buonarroti_128kb.mp3
(4:31 m now)
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/selectedpoems_007_buonarroti_128kb.mp3
(1:20 m)
By the way I think Michelangelo will be very happy with the corrections and so will paint you as reward, with gratitude, as a beautiful angel!
Pier

[Eysiss]

Pier
thank you for uploading the revised sections.
Now they are PL Ok, both sect. 4 and 7

Emanuela

[Eysiss]

Section 9,11,12,13,14,15 and 16: PL OK.

Section 10, at 0:45, last line
I hear "tomigli" instead of "somigli".

Emanuela

[Eysiss]

Section 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25 are PL OK.

Section 17:
at 0:20 5th line I hear "chi" instead of "che".

Emanuela

[Iunta4Ios]

Thanks Emanuela, I will check all this tomorrow.

Pier

[Iunta4Ios]

I uploaded the revised sections 10 and 17:
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/selectedpoems_010_buonarroti_128kb.mp3
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/selectedpoems_017_buonarroti_128kb.mp3
(length practically unchanged in both files)

A small question. Could you already check the last revised version of sections 5 and 6?
Pier

[Kazbek]

I uploaded the revised sections 10 and 17:
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/selectedpoems_010_buonarroti_128kb.mp3
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/selectedpoems_017_buonarroti_128kb.mp3
(length practically unchanged in both files)

A small question. Could you already check the last revised version of sections 5 and 6?
Pier

Thank you, Pier. By "practically unchanged", do you mean that the mm:ss form is unchanged? If it has changed by a little, we should record it, because BCs and MCs use this information to catch version mismatches.

Michael

[Iunta4Ios]

I uploaded the revised sections 10 and 17:
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/selectedpoems_010_buonarroti_128kb.mp3
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/selectedpoems_017_buonarroti_128kb.mp3
(length practically unchanged in both files)

A small question. Could you already check the last revised version of sections 5 and 6?
Pier

Thank you, Pier. By "practically unchanged", do you mean that the mm:ss form is unchanged? If it has changed by a little, we should record it, because BCs and MCs use this information to catch version mismatches.

Michael

I well understand that the time indication is useful for BCs and MCs to check the correct correspondence with the file, and such a small different is insignificant for that purpose. By the way in case of 0:49: 58 you indicate as 0:49 or 0:50?
When I say "practically unchanged" I mean we changed something like from 0:50:02 to 0:49:58, that would require (to mark the difference) to indicate non only the seconds but also their fraction.
Pier

[Kazbek]

I well understand that the time indication is useful for BCs and MCs to check the correct correspondence with the file, and such a small different is insignificant for that purpose. By the way in case of 0:49: 58 you indicate as 0:49 or 0:50?
When I say "practically unchanged" I mean we changed something like from 0:50:02 to 0:49:58, that would require (to mark the difference) to indicate non only the seconds but also their fraction.
Pier

Thanks for the confirmation. If rounding manually, I would round 0:49.58 to 0:50, but automatic rounding is sometimes different, depending on how you access the file, so I ignore differences of one second for the purposes of verification.

Michael

[Iunta4Ios]

The main problem Michael,
is that I am, after all, a quite boring mechanical engineer ( even if I so much like literature and poetry), and so it repels my nature to say that the duration of a file is the "same" even if there is just a millisecond difference.
Pier