[COMPLETE] The Anzac Book by various - tg

KevinS · Post by **KevinS** » February 22nd, 2020, 8:35 pm

AdamBielka wrote: ↑February 22nd, 2020, 8:13 pm https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/anzacbook_55_various_128kb.mp3
Section 55 : 01:44

Thank you!

AdamBielka · Post by **AdamBielka** » February 23rd, 2020, 12:48 am

https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/anzacbook_62_various_128kb.mp3

Section 62: 13:01

linny · Post by **linny** » February 23rd, 2020, 10:07 am

Kevin,
Sections 40 and 77 are both PL OK.

KevinS · Post by **KevinS** » February 23rd, 2020, 10:20 am

linny wrote: ↑February 23rd, 2020, 10:07 am Kevin,
Sections 40 and 77 are both PL OK.

Thank you, linny!

AdamBielka · Post by **AdamBielka** » February 24th, 2020, 10:43 am

A few more sections...

https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/anzacbook_11_various_128kb.mp3 1:37
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/anzacbook_20_various_128kb.mp3 3:54
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/anzacbook_24_various_128kb.mp3 1:56
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/anzacbook_30_various_128kb.mp3 1:38
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/anzacbook_70_various_128kb.mp3 0:39
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/anzacbook_75_various_128kb.mp3 0:48

AdamBielka · Post by **AdamBielka** » February 24th, 2020, 11:02 am

Corrected disclaimer error, changed runtimes for :
Sections...
11 - 1:45
20 -4:01
24 - 2:02
62 -13:07

KevinS · Post by **KevinS** » February 24th, 2020, 11:13 am

AdamBielka wrote: ↑February 24th, 2020, 11:02 am Corrected disclaimer error, changed runtimes for :
Sections...
11 - 1:45
20 -4:01
24 - 2:02
62 -13:07

Okay. Thanks!

adr6090 · Post by **adr6090** » March 6th, 2020, 1:29 pm

Hello Kevin,
I would like to claim 53,54,57 & 76 if they are still open.
April

KevinS · Post by **KevinS** » March 6th, 2020, 1:38 pm

adr6090 wrote: ↑March 6th, 2020, 1:29 pm Hello Kevin,
I would like to claim 53,54,57 & 76 if they are still open.
April

Wonderful! Thank you! I'll sign you up.

adr6090 · Post by **adr6090** » March 6th, 2020, 3:00 pm

Thanks Kevin!!

KevinS wrote: ↑March 6th, 2020, 1:38 pm
adr6090 wrote: ↑March 6th, 2020, 1:29 pm Hello Kevin,
I would like to claim 53,54,57 & 76 if they are still open.
April
Wonderful! Thank you! I'll sign you up.

adr6090 · Post by **adr6090** » March 7th, 2020, 12:27 pm

Hello Kevin,
I noticed an error on my part. I did not mean to claim the caveman;53 I meant to claim Jenny;26
Looks as though 26 is still open so please mark that one claimed by me and take me off of the caveman.
Thank you,
April

KevinS · Post by **KevinS** » March 7th, 2020, 12:34 pm

adr6090 wrote: ↑March 7th, 2020, 12:27 pm Hello Kevin,
I noticed an error on my part. I did not mean to claim the caveman;53 I meant to claim Jenny;26
Looks as though 26 is still open so please mark that one claimed by me and take me off of the caveman.
Thank you,
April

Got it!

adr6090 · Post by **adr6090** » March 10th, 2020, 3:36 pm

Hello,
I am editing section 26 & when an * is present how would you like me to mention that? I recorded it as "footnote" & realize that it is not an actual footnote....

Please do tell me what I should say...
Thank you,
April

KevinS · Post by **KevinS** » March 10th, 2020, 3:51 pm

adr6090 wrote: ↑March 10th, 2020, 3:36 pm Hello,
I am editing section 26 & when an * is present how would you like me to mention that? I recorded it as "footnote" & realize that it is not an actual footnote.... Please do tell me what I should say...
Thank you,
April

It really is a footnote, though we are perhaps most used to numbers marking them. Here, there is only one in the work so an asterisk serves. Sometimes one sees even stranger marks.

I think including the footnote is fine. Don't feel obligated, but here it adds some items of interest.

Oh, and specifically: Open footnote. Close footnote.

adr6090 · Post by **adr6090** » March 10th, 2020, 5:13 pm

KevinS wrote: ↑March 10th, 2020, 3:51 pm
adr6090 wrote: ↑March 10th, 2020, 3:36 pm Hello,
I am editing section 26 & when an * is present how would you like me to mention that? I recorded it as "footnote" & realize that it is not an actual footnote.... Please do tell me what I should say...
Thank you,
April
It really is a footnote, though we are perhaps most used to numbers marking them. Here, there is only one in the work so an asterisk serves. Sometimes one sees even stranger marks.

I think including the footnote is fine. Don't feel obligated, but here it adds some items of interest.

Oh, and specifically: Open footnote. Close footnote.

I just have the word "footnote" at the beginning with "end of footnote" at the end. Would you like for me to change those to "Open footnote. Close footnote"
It does indeed add some items of interest.