COMPLETE Jurisprudence by John Salmond-mas

Solo or group recordings that are finished and fully available for listeners
Post Reply
linny
Posts: 15363
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny »

Michael,
Both sections 33 and 34 are spot check PL OK. Thank you! :thumbs:
linny
Posts: 15363
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny »

TriciaG wrote: November 29th, 2018, 1:55 pm And section 38 - 17:03

https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_38_salmond_128kb.mp3

I included a rendering of the chart at the end of the appendix (page 486). If it's not needed or if it's too confusing, I can cut it out.
Tricia,
You did a great job with the summary. :thumbs:

9:31 repeat – and the law of status. The first deals with proprietary rights in rem, the second with proprietary rights in personam, and the third with personal as opposed to proprietary rights. 6. The Law of Property.
TriciaG
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 60744
Joined: June 15th, 2008, 10:30 pm
Location: Toronto, ON (but Minnesotan to age 32)

Post by TriciaG »

School fiction: David Blaize
America Exploration: The First Four Voyages of Amerigo Vespucci
Serial novel: The Wandering Jew
Medieval England meets Civil War Americans: Centuries Apart
linny
Posts: 15363
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny »

Tricia,
Sections 36 and 38 are both spot check PL OK. :thumbs:
DivMS
Posts: 792
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

Thank you Linny, Michael and Tricia! :D
Divya
DivMS
Posts: 792
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

Section 22 is now open.
Divya
MaryAnnSpiegel
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 18347
Joined: February 23rd, 2009, 4:37 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Post by MaryAnnSpiegel »

Divya,

I would like to get back into reading and would like to claim 22 and 23 (both sections on persons).

MaryAnn
DivMS
Posts: 792
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

MaryAnnSpiegel wrote: December 7th, 2018, 8:51 am Divya,

I would like to get back into reading and would like to claim 22 and 23 (both sections on persons).

MaryAnn
Thank you MaryAnn! :D
Divya
lethargilistic
Posts: 266
Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
Contact:

Post by lethargilistic »

linny wrote: November 17th, 2018, 11:04 am Mike,
Thank you for your patience. There are a few PL notes for section 37. Nicely done. I enjoyed your disclaimer. :wink:

5:28 word change – There was no general principle that an agreement, as such, had the force of law.
I hear assignment

12:52 missing text - …and a precedent may be contrary to established law, and yet authoritative for the future. See section 66.

14:51 repeat – That is to say, the substantive law should determine the scope of the law of procedure, and not vice versa.

15:01 word change – Legal procedure should be sufficiently elastic and comprehensive to afford the requisite means for the protection of all rights…
I hear prerequisite.
Hello! Dropped off the map due to a housing crisis, but it's fixed now! Here are the corrections for section 37.

https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_37_salmond_128kb.mp3 (15:57)

5:26: Agreement

12:52: Section 66

14:48: Repeat removed

15:01: Requisite
Mike
DivMS
Posts: 792
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

lethargilistic wrote: January 21st, 2019, 6:51 pm Hello! Dropped off the map due to a housing crisis, but it's fixed now! Here are the corrections for section 37.

https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_37_salmond_128kb.mp3 (15:57)

5:26: Agreement

12:52: Section 66

14:48: Repeat removed

15:01: Requisite
Thanks Mike :D
Divya
linny
Posts: 15363
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny »

Hi Mike,
I'm glad to see you are all situated again.

Section 37 is spot check PL OK. :thumbs:
DivMS
Posts: 792
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

Section 22 and 23 are now open
lethargilistic
Posts: 266
Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
Contact:

Post by lethargilistic »

Section 30. Sorry it took so long!

https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_30_salmond_128kb.mp3 (32:57)

At 30:23, I had to rerecord a line, but my laptop's fan is out of alignment and clicking in the background. Nothing I can do about that today, but I'll have another computer to use shortly.
Mike
linny
Posts: 15363
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny »

Hi Mike,
Only one reading correction for you. All the others are repeats you missed during editing.

Volume is a little too loud at 92.8dB. We allow for 86-92dB but aim for 89dB. Please decrease by ~3dB.

6:24 repeat – All lawful use is either general (that is to say, residuary) or specific, the former being ownership, and the latter encumbrance.

6:42 repeat – The first constitute the natural limits of ownership. They are the various applications of the maxim:

7:40 repeat – some encumbrancer may own rights over it

8:07 repeat – That which is a right of ownership when there are no encumbrances, remains a right of ownership notwithstanding any number of them.

16:20 repeat – For the class of movable property is residuary, and includes all rights which can make good no claim to be classed as immovable.

16:55 repeat – A right over a chattel is movable property, and where the chattel goes the right goes also.

21:56 word change – The immaterial product of a man’s brains may be as valuable as his land or his goods.
I hear material

25:14 repeat – As already stated, the chief of these are four in number, namely Leases, Servitudes, Securities, and Trusts.

When you post your corrections, please provide updated timestamps.
lethargilistic
Posts: 266
Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
Contact:

Post by lethargilistic »

https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_30_salmond_128kb.mp3 (32:30)

6:15: fixed repeat – All lawful use is either general (that is to say, residuary) or specific, the former being ownership, and the latter encumbrance.

6:29 fixed repeat – The first constitute the natural limits of ownership. They are the various applications of the maxim:

7:24 fixed repeat – some encumbrancer may own rights over it

7:44 fixed repeat – That which is a right of ownership when there are no encumbrances, remains a right of ownership notwithstanding any number of them.

15:50 fixed repeat – For the class of movable property is residuary, and includes all rights which can make good no claim to be classed as immovable.

16:23 fixed repeat – A right over a chattel is movable property, and where the chattel goes the right goes also.

21:23 word change – material -> immaterial

24:35 fixed repeat – As already stated, the chief of these are four in number, namely Leases, Servitudes, Securities, and Trusts.

29:45 Fixed the clicking noise.
Mike
Post Reply