[COMPLETE]Some Articles About Mark Twain - dlo

Solo or group recordings that are finished and fully available for listeners
DrPGould
Posts: 2785
Joined: December 12th, 2016, 9:27 pm

Post by DrPGould »

John:

Section 2 is also nicely read but there is a technical issue, one note and a suggestion:

technical--checker clocked this at 97.9 db. The range is 86-92.

note at 1:53 I heard "read dark brick" : I expected "dark red brick"

suggestion at 2:29 I heard "is half concealed" : the text reads "in half concealed" --I would suggest not altering this--I think there is a typo in the text. However, it's up to you.

Enjoyed your reading.

Many thanks,

Philip
Back after 8/15. In the hands of the medicos.
johng
Posts: 4695
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:38 pm
Location: Orland, Maine USA
Contact:

Post by johng »

DrPGould wrote:John:

Section 2 is also nicely read but there is a technical issue, one note and a suggestion:

technical--checker clocked this at 97.9 db. The range is 86-92.

note at 1:53 I heard "read dark brick" : I expected "dark red brick"

suggestion at 2:29 I heard "is half concealed" : the text reads "in half concealed" --I would suggest not altering this--I think there is a typo in the text. However, it's up to you.

Enjoyed your reading.

Many thanks,

Philip
Thanks for the audio check!!!! I'd TOTALLY FORGOTTEN to do the audio check!
Will make corrections and make the audio right!
Tnx!
The Trouble is,
you think you have Time.
-Buddha
johng
Posts: 4695
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:38 pm
Location: Orland, Maine USA
Contact:

Post by johng »

DrPGould wrote:John:

Section 2 is also nicely read but there is a technical issue, one note and a suggestion:

technical--checker clocked this at 97.9 db. The range is 86-92.

note at 1:53 I heard "read dark brick" : I expected "dark red brick"

suggestion at 2:29 I heard "is half concealed" : the text reads "in half concealed" --I would suggest not altering this--I think there is a typo in the text. However, it's up to you.

Enjoyed your reading.

Many thanks,

Philip
I've decided to leave the typo correction at 2:29...there's no way it works with the typo in place.
That's one of the things I've been trying to do with ALL the MT writings....make obvious corrections, wherever possible.
But please don't hesitate to continue asking!
The Trouble is,
you think you have Time.
-Buddha
johng
Posts: 4695
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:38 pm
Location: Orland, Maine USA
Contact:

Post by johng »

Chap 2 AND chap one have both been corrected to just over 88db...and sent in

Chap 2 has been corrected
The Trouble is,
you think you have Time.
-Buddha
johng
Posts: 4695
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:38 pm
Location: Orland, Maine USA
Contact:

Post by johng »

chapter 3 is ready and sent in
The Trouble is,
you think you have Time.
-Buddha
johng
Posts: 4695
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:38 pm
Location: Orland, Maine USA
Contact:

Post by johng »

Chapter 4 is ready
The Trouble is,
you think you have Time.
-Buddha
DrPGould
Posts: 2785
Joined: December 12th, 2016, 9:27 pm

Post by DrPGould »

John:

Chapter 2 is PL OK! So are Chapters 3 & 4! Well done! :clap:

It has been a privilege to work with you on this project. See you on the boards.

Many thanks,

Philip
Back after 8/15. In the hands of the medicos.
dlolso21
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 4827
Joined: January 11th, 2011, 12:13 pm

Post by dlolso21 »

John,

Since you used the "London World", do you want to adjust the summary to reflect that as a source?

I don't know how much difference there is between the two versions, except that the "London World" credits one if it's editors as the author while the "Literature. Weekly Magazine" does not give any author.

David O
johng
Posts: 4695
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:38 pm
Location: Orland, Maine USA
Contact:

Post by johng »

dlolso21 wrote:John,

Since you used the "London World", do you want to adjust the summary to reflect that as a source?

I don't know how much difference there is between the two versions, except that the "London World" credits one if it's editors as the author while the "Literature. Weekly Magazine" does not give any author.

David O
good idea.
I've made an adjustment....will that do??
Or maybe I misunderstood??
The Trouble is,
you think you have Time.
-Buddha
johng
Posts: 4695
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:38 pm
Location: Orland, Maine USA
Contact:

Post by johng »

DrPGould wrote:John:

Chapter 2 is PL OK! So are Chapters 3 & 4! Well done! :clap:

It has been a privilege to work with you on this project. See you on the boards.

Many thanks,

Philip
thank YOU Philip, for your speedy and very perceptive corrections!!!

:-)
-j
The Trouble is,
you think you have Time.
-Buddha
dlolso21
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 4827
Joined: January 11th, 2011, 12:13 pm

Post by dlolso21 »

John,

I like that summary. I am going to catalog this to show each author and original source so Edmund Yates gets his credit.

David O
DrPGould
Posts: 2785
Joined: December 12th, 2016, 9:27 pm

Post by DrPGould »

It was a privilege and a pleasure to work with you both on this project. I hope our paths cross again!

Many thanks,

Philip
Back after 8/15. In the hands of the medicos.
dlolso21
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 4827
Joined: January 11th, 2011, 12:13 pm

Post by dlolso21 »

John and Phillip,

Thank you for sharing your time and talents, and for your patience with me!!

This project is in the Librivox Catalog: https://librivox.org/some-articles-about-mark-twain-by-various/

David O
johng
Posts: 4695
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:38 pm
Location: Orland, Maine USA
Contact:

Post by johng »

dlolso21 wrote:John,

I like that summary. I am going to catalog this to show each author and original source so Edmund Yates gets his credit.

David O
David,
Thank you for finding an Edmund Yates reference!!
I was unable to.
How did you find it??
-j
The Trouble is,
you think you have Time.
-Buddha
dlolso21
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 4827
Joined: January 11th, 2011, 12:13 pm

Post by dlolso21 »

John,

He has a Wikipedia page; that page states he was an editor and frequent writer for “The London.”

David O
Post Reply