[Complete] Stories Worth Rereading by Various authors - lt

Solo or group recordings that are finished and fully available for listeners
Post Reply
chulsky
Posts: 3073
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 2:13 pm
Location: MA, USA
Contact:

Post by chulsky »

Sara, your sections 34, 52, 70 were PL OK when I listened to them.
If you re-uploaded the same tracks, they are PL OK (marked in the MW)
If you re-recorded them or changed in any way, please let me know, and I will listen again.
Mark Chulsky / Марк Чульский
SaraHale
Posts: 1433
Joined: June 17th, 2016, 1:20 pm
Location: Egypt

Post by SaraHale »

karlkuzmich wrote:Sara, your sections 34, 52, 70 were PL OK when I listened to them.
If you re-uploaded the same tracks, they are PL OK (marked in the MW)
If you re-recorded them or changed in any way, please let me know, and I will listen again.
I re-uploaded the same tracks. Thank you, Mark.
Thanks, SaraHale. :D
Constructive criticism is always welcome. :thumbs:
SirVive
Posts: 13
Joined: May 21st, 2015, 9:22 pm

Post by SirVive »

I still have the file for my recording of Section 48 'Why the Mite Boxes were Full' Not sure if it had been PL'ed or not since I was out of the country for a while. I had also claimed Sections 47 & 49 I believe but life has gotten really hectic here too so if there is someone else who wants them that's ok with me - otherwise I'll be happy to try to fit them in somewhere.

https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/storiesworthrereading_48_various_128kb.mp3
chulsky
Posts: 3073
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 2:13 pm
Location: MA, USA
Contact:

Post by chulsky »

SirVive wrote:I still have the file for my recording of Section 48 'Why the Mite Boxes were Full'
I remember that story, it was PL OK! Thank you!
Roohi, please take it off your list!
Mark Chulsky / Марк Чульский
sanjay67
Posts: 161
Joined: July 30th, 2016, 7:10 pm

Post by sanjay67 »

Lynnet,

Section 89: 'Wanted: An Employer' is PL OK. I had re-uploaded it after the data loss incident. I just noticed that the status still shows 'Assigned'.

Thanks!

Sanjay
Trotsa
Posts: 736
Joined: March 12th, 2014, 11:47 am
Location: southern girl... in Mississippi

Post by Trotsa »

sanjay67 wrote:Lynnet,

Section 89: 'Wanted: An Employer' is PL OK. I had re-uploaded it after the data loss incident. I just noticed that the status still shows 'Assigned'.

Thanks!

Sanjay
Thanks Sanjay! Fixed.
Trotsa

[/size]I am an imperfect person loved by a PERFECT God.
Trotsa
Posts: 736
Joined: March 12th, 2014, 11:47 am
Location: southern girl... in Mississippi

Post by Trotsa »

Roohi, I assigned 91, 97, & 94 to you. As they were orphaned before the crash. If you don't want them let me know! Thanks. :)
Trotsa

[/size]I am an imperfect person loved by a PERFECT God.
Trotsa
Posts: 736
Joined: March 12th, 2014, 11:47 am
Location: southern girl... in Mississippi

Post by Trotsa »

Trotsa

[/size]I am an imperfect person loved by a PERFECT God.
dkimnach
Posts: 63
Joined: August 22nd, 2016, 6:52 pm

Post by dkimnach »

chulsky
Posts: 3073
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 2:13 pm
Location: MA, USA
Contact:

Post by chulsky »

dkimnach wrote:re-posting in case this got missed. These are ready for PL
Thank you for reposting, I bet they were lost in the big crash. Will PL in a few days.
Mark Chulsky / Марк Чульский
chulsky
Posts: 3073
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 2:13 pm
Location: MA, USA
Contact:

Post by chulsky »

Sec.9,25,65 are PL OK :thumbs:
Mark Chulsky / Марк Чульский
chulsky
Posts: 3073
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 2:13 pm
Location: MA, USA
Contact:

Post by chulsky »

Sec. 77,80 are PL OK :thumbs:
Sec. 76: the Checker (http://wiki.librivox.org/index.php/Checker) reports a high level of background noise, 47 dB. I did not hear any noise, but still might benefit from cleaning.
Mark Chulsky / Марк Чульский
kathrinee
Posts: 8397
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 5:09 am
Location: in the sun

Post by kathrinee »

karlkuzmich wrote:Sec. 77,80 are PL OK :thumbs:
Sec. 76: the Checker (http://wiki.librivox.org/index.php/Checker) reports a high level of background noise, 47 dB. I did not hear any noise, but still might benefit from cleaning.
Thank you for catching that. I'll noiseclean it and upload again later. (By the way, could you please explain where the Checker gives this information? I have sort of looked, 'cause it is so handy, but I haven't found it. I guess it is possible that I have a older version.)
Kathrine
Post Reply