Thank you Daniele
I am kind of starving right now, but I'll listen to it, promised
edit: Now I listened to it. Yet another wonderful reader
All tech specs are fine, the reading is really wonderful, there is only one thing - as there are a couple of words and sentences different from the text we use (you can easily access it through the link given in the MW), I suspect that you used a different version, maybe a more modern one. I can understand you very well doing it, it is easier to understand and feels more familiar, but it would alter the text too much.
Somewhere in the depths of this thread I think is even explained (better than I can) why we are asked to use only the given text in the first post:
Sorry I don't find that post right now; it has something to do with maybe simplified language and risk of copyright issues, afair.
The differences I found are:
0:33 I hear "onesta", written is "onestate"
0:39 "e" is missing
0:46 I hear "mi sto", written is "Stommene"
1:05 I hear "E puossi amar virtu per operare", written is "E amar puossi virtù per alto oprare"
The pause in the beginning seems a bit long to me; 0,5 to 1 second is enough there. Also it is not necessary (though I liked it) to repeat the beginning of the poem as title, but that wouldn't hinder me to give you the ok. It is only the altered text that I ask you to re-record some passages. You only need to re-record those, as the text is equal in the other ones
Thank you