I went back to examine carefully the note, and I quite agree with your remark.Eysiss wrote: ↑December 7th, 2019, 1:16 pmHi Pier.
I did not read the note because -for my own opinion- it would have interrupted too much the sense of the speech without adding anything valuable to the meaning of the explanation.
The previous one was -for me- more helping and was at the end of a period, of an explanation.
So I thought it would be better not to read it.
Therefore section 16 is PL OK.