LibriVox Forum

Given that I'm dead either way, I'll take the drowning. At least I get to see some fish on my way to my last reward.

Would you rather be forced to listen to 72 hours of bad banjo playing or bad bagpipe playing?

(Bonus silliness: What's the definition of perfect pitch? When you throw a banjo in a dumpster and it lands on a bagpipe.)

72 hours of bad banjo playing every time. Couldn't stand the constant drone of the bagpipes.


12 hours trapped in a lift with a constant talker, or a constant farter ???

Constant talker for sure, as for farter... ewwwww.


Either
Being forced to drink a gallon of milk at once
Eat a 4-day old hamburger(refrigerated).

4 days is just getting good...yum.

Would you rather be stuck on the tarmac for three hours and then turned back to the gate just minutes before takeoff (because the 3-hour limit kicked in) and spend then night in O'Hare airport and miss your nephew's graduation or have to take a bus from Chicago to Vermont with a broken rest room?

I don't sound bitter, do I?

I guess I would have to take the bus.

Would you rather be lost in the worlds largest maze or be lost at sea?

What kind of maze?

Worlds Largest Maze.
Would You Rather save the life of a starving African child that you will never meet, or have an real, working light saber?

African child... So much more joyful!

Would you rather relinquish hugs, etc., or words of love?

Hugs

Would you rather give up TV or Internet?

Television, definitely! The Internet has a broader, fuller, richer scope.

Would you rather be five or six hours early to an important event, forced to sit in the waiting room with nothing to do for that duration, or half an hour late to the same crucial event?

bethesdalily wrote:Television, definitely! The Internet has a broader, fuller, richer scope.

Would you rather be five or six hours early to an important event, forced to sit in the waiting room with nothing to do for that duration, or half an hour late to the same crucial event?

I'd rather be early.

If it was your choice, would you rather have every book published before 1960 be in the public domain, or would you rather go on a vacation anywhere you want?

Ooooh, the entire book collection all the way!

Would you rather have an absolutely unlimited library of anything you've ever wanted to read, but be able to borrow books for only one week, only once...

Or have your own collection of ten favorites, which are yours for the reading and rereading, but without the possibility of ever gaining any more reading material?

For the record, I couldn't decide on this one--too hard!

The first option. Wait. Regretting this decision already... oh, if I could just read Oliver Twist one more time!

How about this one: (the idea for this came after my last question, and this ones an extremely tough decision!)

Would you rather have every book before 1960 be in the public domain and never be able to record again* or would you rather have the copyright system as is?

*You could still PL or read books, just not record them yourself.

How ironic! I think I'd relinquish my ability to record for all pre-1960 books to be PD, AS LONG AS others could record the books and I could PL... The best of both worlds!

Would you rather lose a long recording project that you had worked hard on, without the possibility of re-uploading it, or be forced to keep raw or amateurish work you had done--something you weren't as proud of--complete with bloopers and poor recording quality?

I think I'd go with the first option there.

...Well, no, let's not be too self-conscious... The second option.