PD sounds

Comments about LibriVox? Suggestions to improve things? News?
Post Reply
Peter Why
Posts: 4295
Joined: November 24th, 2005, 3:54 am
Location: Chigwell (North-East London, U.K.)

Post by Peter Why » February 7th, 2019, 11:29 pm

There are occasions when a sound (or sometimes music) would be helpful in one of our recordings ... this seems to be especially true for our dramatic readings. The main objection that I've seen to sounds being included is that there may be copyright problems if we use a sound that's been made available on the internet.

There's an LV project running at the moment where the (apparently ghostly) sound of drumming is often referred to within the story, but the drumming recordings available online were felt to be chancy to use.

We must have someone among us who would be able to record a short burst of drumming sounds. And there must be lots of other minor sounds which we could make available in this way.

We already accept songs where the music is known to be PD, or that have been composed by the reader and placed in the public domain (I've done a few of these myself).

I remember that one of us, years ago (his first name was Stefan, I think), started to do this and eventually moved off site to create an online collection of PD sounds. I don't know what happened to that collection. Would it be worth our making our own PD sounds available for our recordings?

Peter
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist." Kenneth Boulding, 1973

tovarisch
Posts: 2618
Joined: February 24th, 2013, 7:14 am
Location: New Hampshire, USA

Post by tovarisch » February 8th, 2019, 12:06 pm

It's a good idea, but a slippery slope, I'm afraid. Would a "street noise" or "crowd noise" recorded today somewhere, be accepted? Or should the producer ask a signed release from everybody possibly audible in that recording? So, anybody contributing needs to be very careful lest they wade into a swamp of legal issues... But its a good idea.
tovarisch
  • reality prompts me to scale down my reading, sorry to say
    to PLers: do correct my pronunciation please

mightyfelix
Posts: 3072
Joined: August 7th, 2016, 6:39 pm

Post by mightyfelix » February 8th, 2019, 12:31 pm

I think we would be rather particular about what kinds of noises are involved. And it's not as if anyone is looking to add sound effects to every minute of their recording. We're not producing radio dramas, we're producing audio books, and we want to stay true to that.

That being said, there are occasionally works which draw close attention to a particular sound. In those instances, I think it would be appropriate to add it in at strategic moments.

Crowd noises are probably not necessary, especially for dramatic readings. You can blend a nice crowd noise from your readers if need be.

smike
Posts: 1758
Joined: April 23rd, 2013, 3:44 am
Location: Germany

Post by smike » February 8th, 2019, 1:35 pm

Personally, I hate background noise (i.e. sound) in audio books. I'm really happy they aren't allowed in LV recordings. :)
Claudia

So much to do, so little time...

JayKitty76
Posts: 832
Joined: August 3rd, 2018, 3:16 pm
Location: In a galaxy far, far away...
Contact:

Post by JayKitty76 » February 8th, 2019, 4:35 pm

The only 'sound effect/background music' I've heard on LV is on the podcasts. I could be wrong, though (definitely don't quote me on that!). I actually prefer no background music or effects or anything in the audiobooks. I think that audiobooks vs radio dramas are two different things, like Devorah mentioned, and even in the DRs it is not a radio drama. I think that we are well off not adding music or effects, since that takes away from the words and story of the book.
(That's just my personal opinion- really, it's the admin team's call. :wink: )

Best,
JayKitty

annise
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 30403
Joined: April 3rd, 2008, 3:55 am
Location: Melbourne,Australia

Post by annise » February 8th, 2019, 5:04 pm

Personal opinions are irrelevant on LV.
The admin team have spoken several times, it's in the policy. Unless it's a "music" project like the Christmas carols, you can only use something you are producing yourself and you are composing and you are releasing into the PD if the text calls for it and the BC feels they need to.
To paraphrase our founder - does it enhance our prime directive? - and the answer is no.

Anne
It would be such fun to create a BBC radio play - I'd forgotten about them but found them recently on Archive, but that's not what we are about.

Peter Why
Posts: 4295
Joined: November 24th, 2005, 3:54 am
Location: Chigwell (North-East London, U.K.)

Post by Peter Why » February 9th, 2019, 12:54 am

I accept the general opinion expressed here but, for me, occasional sounds add to the texture and intensity of a reading. So if I ever record something that seems to need this, I will create a second recording with the sounds, to go independently on archive.org.

EDIT: I would have loved to hear the faint, fading, intricate sound of a flute around the outro of The Piper At The Gates Of Dawn in The Wind In The Willows.

Peter
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist." Kenneth Boulding, 1973

mightyfelix
Posts: 3072
Joined: August 7th, 2016, 6:39 pm

Post by mightyfelix » February 9th, 2019, 1:48 am

I'm guessing that if one was to do that, they'd need to remove the LV disclaimer? Or no? :hmm:

Peter Why
Posts: 4295
Joined: November 24th, 2005, 3:54 am
Location: Chigwell (North-East London, U.K.)

Post by Peter Why » February 9th, 2019, 1:55 am

Not if I was playing the flute, extemporising.

Or, if you're referring to the post before, if I put one of my recordings, plus sound effects, on archive.org, of course I'd remove reference to LV in the recording, but I'd mention the duplication in a text summary.

Peter
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist." Kenneth Boulding, 1973

mightyfelix
Posts: 3072
Joined: August 7th, 2016, 6:39 pm

Post by mightyfelix » February 9th, 2019, 11:08 am

Peter Why wrote:
February 9th, 2019, 1:55 am
Or, if you're referring to the post before, if I put one of my recordings, plus sound effects, on archive.org, of course I'd remove reference to LV in the recording, but I'd mention the duplication in a text summary.

Peter
Yes, that is what I was asking. Thank you! Makes perfect sense.

chocoholic
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 13762
Joined: January 16th, 2007, 9:23 am
Contact:

Post by chocoholic » February 10th, 2019, 11:45 am

Peter Why wrote:
February 9th, 2019, 12:54 am
So if I ever record something that seems to need this, I will create a second recording with the sounds, to go independently on archive.org.
Yes! This is exactly what we've suggested in the past (it's also in our Wiki on the Music and Sound Effects page). We put the plain vanilla version on the LV website, and we can mention the non-LV sound effects version in the catalog summary.

I'm not sure how many people have taken up this suggestion, but it has always seemed a good compromise to me. Giving listeners the choice is a good thing too; I am another who doesn't care for sound effects in a reading.
Laurie Anne

Post Reply