Recording and Editing

Comments about LibriVox? Suggestions to improve things? News?
Yakumo
Posts: 141
Joined: February 27th, 2006, 7:58 am

Post by Yakumo »

I just read a short story aloud to get a feel for the sound of my own voice and its fluency. My reading got better over time, but there were an enormous number of mistakes. I wasn't recording, just trying out my voice.

How do people at librivox perfer to mark their errors when recording?

Is the recording experiences diffrent from reading text out loud to yourself?

If reading into a microphone is anything like my experience reading aloud to myself, then, I imagine the toughest part of the process and the most tedius would be marking and editing out my mistakes.

any sugestions or comments?
marlodianne
Posts: 332
Joined: December 24th, 2005, 10:53 am
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Contact:

Post by marlodianne »

Well, the mistakes might not be that usual for you. If you're tired or such, or if the text is particularly of awkward or strange languaged, they can happen very often. Sometimes you just need to slow down, or do it on a day where you're feeling more comfortable. Or do an laughable amount of retakes, and edit it til it's smooth. This is true even if you record all the time :)

Personally I don't mark my errors; I proof listen my recordings. It's highly likely you'll catch a mispeak or a background click or something else that you didn't notice at recording. I know someone who once mentioned listening back revealed the moment when his wife put on the laundry. "What is...*that*? Ugh! The washing machine!" If you're really focusing on your text, as you should be, this stuff can go right by you. That's what your post-record proofing and editing step will catch. It's two different hats. Like writing and revising. :)

Also, your mic may 'drop' or distort. This can happen if your processor is feeling taxed and grumpy. It will result in a garbled word or even a few minutes of recording. You could never mark that either, there's no sign of anything wrong until you listen back to what you just recorded.

I think it's more accurate to say it's like sharing a story with a friend. If you're doing it right, it's much more personal and unique than just reading aloud.
Marlo Dianne
Writer, Artist, Wondergeek
forbiddendragon.blogspot.com

"We live as though the world was as it should be, to show it what it can be." --Angel
ChipDoc
Posts: 1277
Joined: January 4th, 2006, 3:11 am
Location: Tampa, FL
Contact:

Post by ChipDoc »

Yakumo wrote:How do people at librivox perfer to mark their errors when recording?
I don't mark them at all. When I make an error, I simply redo that part without making any technical adjustments whatsoever. When I do the editing (immediately after finishing the recording) the re-do stands right out - at least it does if I'm listening as opposed to reading the forum... ;)
Yakumo wrote:Is the recording experiences diffrent from reading text out loud to yourself?
Oh yes. If I'm reading aloud then it's simply for the pleasure of speaking the words, and I often get fairly weird with them. If I'm reading for LibriVox, I tend to speak the words exactly as they're written rather than getting off into flights of fancy.
Yakumo wrote:If reading into a microphone is anything like my experience reading aloud to myself, then, I imagine the toughest part of the process and the most tedius would be marking and editing out my mistakes.

any sugestions or comments?
I know a lot of people hate editing, but I've always rather enjoyed it. If I'm editing something I've already read, it means that the tough part (the reading itself) is behind me and it's now time for the pleasure of making it as perfect as I can. Admittedly, editing my voice is nothing new to me. I've been doing it since I was in my teens. Being able to do it digitally is SO much easier than doing it with magnetic tape, a splicing block, and a razor blade!

Here's a hint: if you make a mistake and have to re-read a section, begin the re-do a few words ahead of where you made the mistake. This will do two things:

1) your voice will be "up to speed" by the time you reach the mistake, and

2) it will give you several "join points" where you can make the splice cleanly.
-Chip
Retired to Colorado
The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them.
~Mark Twain
Mark Barnes
Posts: 27
Joined: April 24th, 2006, 1:24 pm
Contact:

Post by Mark Barnes »

When I stumble over words or make an error, I take a very long pause (~20secs) before starting that sentence again. It has two benefits:

1) When I've finished, I just need to scan the waveform for pauses, and I can very easily edit out the error.

2) Taking the pause means I can re-read the sentence a few times before I attempt it again, and I've calmed down if I've got annoyed with myself!

Mark
thistlechick
Posts: 6170
Joined: November 30th, 2005, 12:14 pm
Location: Michigan

Post by thistlechick »

Many people mark their repeats with a tap on the microphone or say a distinct word like "AGAIN" ... this alerts them in their listen-through to the edit...

Yakumo, you've been doing tons of proof-listening (for which we are grateful!) ... but I think your perspective may be skewed by this.... each of the recordings you have heard has probably already gone through one, if not two, editing sessions before it has reached your ears....

believe me when I say, it is more common to make mistakes and stumble over words often in a recording than it is to read a piece through without error....

If you'd like to practice some editing, and hear some of the stumbling first hand, I'd be happy to send you one of my recordings that still needs editing ;)
~ Betsie
Multiple projects lead to multiple successes!
hugh
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 7972
Joined: September 26th, 2005, 4:14 am
Location: Montreal, QC
Contact:

Post by hugh »

oh yeah, defninitely. if you can get through a page without making a mistake, you are a star; let alone a whole recordings.

my preferred marking technique is a *whistle* - which you can see easily on the waveforms (silence would do the trick too).

some have complained that a tap of the mic disrupts the membrane a bit and results in a "hum." so you may want to be careful about that.
JickBahTech
Posts: 25
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 12:21 am
Location: So Cal
Contact:

Post by JickBahTech »

Yeah I would avoid tapping on the mic, as it could shorten the life of your mic over time.

I find a good pause is really all I need. Some people use "markers" of some kind like noise makers or the pop-top lids on snapple bottles for a distinctive visual cue.

I know some programs will even let you drop flags (like in Sound Forge pressing the letter M drops a marker flag).

But really it's all about what will work for you. The more you record the more you'll develop your own system.
Thomas Bailey Aldrich (1870)
"A woman is sitting alone in a house. She knows she is alone in the whole world; every other living thing is dead. The doorbell rings."
Alys
Posts: 140
Joined: January 23rd, 2006, 6:59 pm
Location: Massachusetts, USA

Post by Alys »

I like to click my tongue a few times. I dont' have to worry about messing up the mic and it makes a series of sharp visual spikes that are really obvious if I want to just scan for them when editing, and also creates an obvious noise if I'm actually listening to the edits.
ceastman
Posts: 4195
Joined: December 28th, 2005, 8:36 pm
Location: Redwood City, CA

Post by ceastman »

I also use the tongue-click to mark edits. Since I read my text in a window on the screen, I like to tongue-click before clicking the mouse, using the scroll wheel, etc, and then I click again before starting to read - these are noises that are too quiet to see in the waveform unless you zoom in a lot, and I find it a pain to listen carefully to the long 'silence' to make sure I catch all the little mouse noises and edit them out.

I'll also use it to mark someplace where I catch an error while I'm reading, as a 'redo' mark. But even with those marks, I'll listen and compare against the written text and see if I made little word errors - which happens all the time.

I'm enough of a perfectionist that it really matters to me to make the recording at least word-perfect, and I try to put feeling into it too. So yeah, I edit my stuff a lot, usually. :)

-Catharine
GordMackenzie
Posts: 597
Joined: September 26th, 2005, 5:50 am
Location: Troy, MI

Post by GordMackenzie »

I'm another tongue-clicker!

I use three sharp "ticks" to indicate a redo or pickup. The sharp spikes are easy to spot in the waveform... but they do tend to sound a little silly if I miss an edit and leave them in! :)
Gord Mackenzie
gord[dot]mackenzie[at]gmail.com
Librivox Wiki Page: [url=http://librivox.org/wiki/moin.cgi/GordMackenzie]GordMackenzie[/url]
Yakumo
Posts: 141
Joined: February 27th, 2006, 7:58 am

Post by Yakumo »

thanks everyone! Your advise has helped a lot.

thisstlechick- I think I will take up your offer and practice some editing. Just send me a link via yousendit to my e mail address in my profile.

my perseption is definitly scewed, but that is what happeneds all the time to people who have never done the work themselves.

after I have built up some confidence with editing, I'll see about getting a good microphone and recording.
thistlechick
Posts: 6170
Joined: November 30th, 2005, 12:14 pm
Location: Michigan

Post by thistlechick »

oh, please understand that I wasn't being critical... I adore you for the proof-listening... and I suspect that I will adore you even more for doing some editing for me too... heheh... you are so awesome =)
~ Betsie
Multiple projects lead to multiple successes!
Yakumo
Posts: 141
Joined: February 27th, 2006, 7:58 am

Post by Yakumo »

I know this is a stupid question, but do I need to have an acount with yousendit in order for someone to send me a file?
thistlechick
Posts: 6170
Joined: November 30th, 2005, 12:14 pm
Location: Michigan

Post by thistlechick »

no, you don't need to have an account with yousendit to receive a file... however, I have a url for you instead that I will send you =)
~ Betsie
Multiple projects lead to multiple successes!
Aldark
Posts: 158
Joined: January 11th, 2006, 1:08 pm
Location: Dayton, Ohio

Post by Aldark »

I have to admit if I'm recording later at night I normally drop an f-bomb in my recordings followed by long pause... it is a pretty good indicator for me. Of course some of those f-bombs can last several seconds.

NORMALLY... I just do like Chip, I'll just pause after realizing the mistake and then do a complete re-read of the sentence/paragraph whatever fits the bill. After dabbling a number of times I found this works best for me when editing.
Post Reply