I can't seem to remove this distortion
-
- LibriVox Admin Team
- Posts: 11140
- Joined: August 7th, 2016, 6:39 pm
Can you provide a longer snippet? There's not enough there for me to hear much of anything.
I hear "their berths were commodious" with some distortion (or interference) on the word "berths". You should be able to punch it in, no?
Generally, whenever there's a thump or other sound that gets recorded alongside one's voice, there is not much that can be done in post-processing. Re-recording (punching in) is the best we can do. It's better to start from the beginning of the phrase (or the sentence) and then choose which portion/fraction of the original track to replace with the new one. You can try blending those in as well. I usually just merge them using silence gaps (however short).
Generally, whenever there's a thump or other sound that gets recorded alongside one's voice, there is not much that can be done in post-processing. Re-recording (punching in) is the best we can do. It's better to start from the beginning of the phrase (or the sentence) and then choose which portion/fraction of the original track to replace with the new one. You can try blending those in as well. I usually just merge them using silence gaps (however short).
tovarisch
- reality prompts me to scale down my reading, sorry to say
to PLers: do correct my pronunciation please
I tried "punching it in" but I sounded very different when I tried re-recording it from the original.tovarisch wrote: ↑March 2nd, 2018, 11:54 am I hear "their berths were commodious" with some distortion (or interference) on the word "berths". You should be able to punch it in, no?
Generally, whenever there's a thump or other sound that gets recorded alongside one's voice, there is not much that can be done in post-processing. Re-recording (punching in) is the best we can do. It's better to start from the beginning of the phrase (or the sentence) and then choose which portion/fraction of the original track to replace with the new one. You can try blending those in as well. I usually just merge them using silence gaps (however short).
Don't fret too much. If it's not a dramatic reading, and it's not direct speech that you had to "play", the listener most likely won't notice or will forgive a slight difference in tone or timbre. With time, as you find your voice and technique, it will get more and more consistent.Edmonds wrote: ↑March 2nd, 2018, 3:55 pmI tried "punching it in" but I sounded very different when I tried re-recording it from the original.tovarisch wrote: ↑March 2nd, 2018, 11:54 am I hear "their berths were commodious" with some distortion (or interference) on the word "berths". You should be able to punch it in, no?
Generally, whenever there's a thump or other sound that gets recorded alongside one's voice, there is not much that can be done in post-processing. Re-recording (punching in) is the best we can do. It's better to start from the beginning of the phrase (or the sentence) and then choose which portion/fraction of the original track to replace with the new one. You can try blending those in as well. I usually just merge them using silence gaps (however short).
tovarisch
- reality prompts me to scale down my reading, sorry to say
to PLers: do correct my pronunciation please