Hey, Jim,Jddykst wrote: ↑March 19th, 2021, 7:32 am Thank you for your feedback.
I agree that 'boundless' sounds a little garbled at 6:44, and the tempo isn't what it should be, and I'll try to fix those issues and re-submit.
I believe, however, that we are using different texts, and I think I'm using the one identified at the front of this project -
https://archive.org/details/enquiryconcernin02godwuoft/page/n3/mode/2up
The other two boo-boos, at 4:06 and 8:57, are (I believe) consistent with the above.
I've been guilty, in the past, of using (the clearer) PDF renderings instead of the "straight" html versions while PLing files, but now I always just click on the link in the First Post. I'm going to go check that again, right now.... Yep, I did it right this time. I even included a portion of the title page in my original PL note. Can you do the same from the source you read from? This is a mystery!
What about this? When one clicks on the First Page link, the photographic image of the source appears. But, if one scrolls the SCREEN down, one will see "Download Options", one of which is "PDF". By any chance did you choose one of these other options? I checked the PDF version just now and the title page is identical to the photographic one from which I PLed. So that's not our problem.
Here is what I found on the photographic version of the text on source text page 191:
If it be deemed criminal in any society to wear clothes of a par- ticular texture, or buttons of a particular composition, it is un- avoidable to exclaim, that it is high time the jurisprudence of that society should inform its members what are the fantastic rules by which they mean to proceed.
On this examination, I base my belief that we ARE reading was from different sources. Can you check it out, please? I'm curious about the source ( ) of the mystery.