[GROUP] Jurisprudence by John Salmond-mas

Upcoming books fully-subscribed with readers. Check progress here, too
Post Reply
DivMS
Posts: 417
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS » November 16th, 2018, 9:59 pm

TriciaG wrote:
November 11th, 2018, 5:12 pm
I'll claim sections 36 and 38, please. I might come back to do 35, but it has a lot of terms in a lot of languages - I'll have to work myself up to it and do some research before taking that one on! :lol:
Thank you Tricia! MW updated :D

linny
Posts: 10124
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » November 17th, 2018, 7:51 am

I'll finish PLing section 37 today. I hope you enjoyed your trip. :D

linny
Posts: 10124
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » November 17th, 2018, 11:04 am

Mike,
Thank you for your patience. There are a few PL notes for section 37. Nicely done. I enjoyed your disclaimer. :wink:

5:28 word change – There was no general principle that an agreement, as such, had the force of law.
I hear assignment

12:52 missing text - …and a precedent may be contrary to established law, and yet authoritative for the future. See section 66.

14:51 repeat – That is to say, the substantive law should determine the scope of the law of procedure, and not vice versa.

15:01 word change – Legal procedure should be sufficiently elastic and comprehensive to afford the requisite means for the protection of all rights…
I hear prerequisite.

linny
Posts: 10124
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » November 17th, 2018, 11:34 am

DivMS and MaryAnn,
It's been 7 months since I stepped in to help Ava out. Looks as if you are stuck with me for the duration. :wink:

Would it be ok to be added as DPL so the project shows in my listing?

MaryAnnSpiegel
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 14601
Joined: February 23rd, 2009, 4:37 pm
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by MaryAnnSpiegel » November 17th, 2018, 11:45 am

Switch made. Thanks for all your help on this Linny.
MaryAnn

linny
Posts: 10124
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » November 17th, 2018, 11:49 am

Thank you! I generally rely on the quick links for my posts but the DPL listing is a handy double check. :D

Mfassio
Posts: 163
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 4:35 pm
Location: Kent, Washington USA

Post by Mfassio » November 21st, 2018, 5:39 pm

Thanks,

Michael

"Always read something that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it." — P.J. O’Rourke

Mfassio
Posts: 163
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 4:35 pm
Location: Kent, Washington USA

Post by Mfassio » November 25th, 2018, 4:07 pm

Thanks,

Michael

"Always read something that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it." — P.J. O’Rourke

TriciaG
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 40394
Joined: June 15th, 2008, 10:30 pm
Location: Toronto, ON (but Minnesotan to age 32)

Post by TriciaG » November 28th, 2018, 6:13 pm


linny
Posts: 10124
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » November 29th, 2018, 11:11 am

Michael,
Great job with section 33!

One small correction to make.

0:20 missing part of section title – Chapter 22: The Law of Procedure part 1

TriciaG
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 40394
Joined: June 15th, 2008, 10:30 pm
Location: Toronto, ON (but Minnesotan to age 32)

Post by TriciaG » November 29th, 2018, 1:55 pm

And section 38 - 17:03

https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_38_salmond_128kb.mp3

I included a rendering of the chart at the end of the appendix (page 486). If it's not needed or if it's too confusing, I can cut it out.


(I took the liberty of adding my sections and section 34 to the MW.)

linny
Posts: 10124
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » November 29th, 2018, 2:35 pm

Michael,
Nice work with section 34. I heard one word change which impacts intent.

7:23 – Here, if anywhere, the demerits of law are at a maximum, and those of the opposing system at a minimum.
I hear minimum

linny
Posts: 10124
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » November 29th, 2018, 2:36 pm

TriciaG wrote:
November 29th, 2018, 1:55 pm
(I took the liberty of adding my sections and section 34 to the MW.)
Thank you! I was going to but you got there first. :D

Mfassio
Posts: 163
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 4:35 pm
Location: Kent, Washington USA

Post by Mfassio » November 30th, 2018, 3:56 pm

Thanks,

Michael

"Always read something that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it." — P.J. O’Rourke

linny
Posts: 10124
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » December 1st, 2018, 9:33 am

8:54 Not only is it uncontrolled within its own province, but that province is infinite in extent.
I hear controlled

20:40 And if a statute can be made unrepealable for ten years, how is it legally impossible that it should be made unrepealable for ever?
I hear seven (I likely wouldn’t have mentioned this one except that two sentences prior they also indicate ten years)

I really like the extra pause you left after that long quote. It makes a great transition. :)

Post Reply