COMPLETE Jurisprudence by John Salmond-mas

Solo or group recordings that are finished and fully available for listeners
Post Reply
Mfassio
Posts: 324
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 4:35 pm
Location: Kent, Washington USA

Post by Mfassio »

I would like Section 8. Thanks!
Thanks,

Michael

"Always read something that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it." — P.J. O’Rourke
DivMS
Posts: 788
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

Mfassio wrote: September 21st, 2018, 7:51 pm I would like Section 8. Thanks!
Thank you Michael! MW updated :D
Divya
DivMS
Posts: 788
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

Section 30, 33 and 34 have been put back into the pool for anyone to claim
Divya
Mfassio
Posts: 324
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 4:35 pm
Location: Kent, Washington USA

Post by Mfassio »

I’ll take 33 and 34.
Thanks,

Michael

"Always read something that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it." — P.J. O’Rourke
Mfassio
Posts: 324
Joined: January 5th, 2017, 4:35 pm
Location: Kent, Washington USA

Post by Mfassio »

Thanks,

Michael

"Always read something that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it." — P.J. O’Rourke
DivMS
Posts: 788
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

Mfassio wrote: October 13th, 2018, 11:26 am And here is 8 for PL


https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_08_salmond_128kb.mp3 [26:12]
Thank you Michael!
Section 33 and 34 are all yours :D
Divya
linny
Posts: 15363
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny »

Hello Michael,
Section 8 is PL OK. I really enjoyed your pacing. :thumbs:
lethargilistic
Posts: 266
Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
Contact:

Post by lethargilistic »

I would like Section 37 "Appendix III: Maxims of the Law", please!
Mike
lethargilistic
Posts: 266
Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
Contact:

Post by lethargilistic »

I'd like to read Section 30, "The Law Of Property - Part 1."
Mike
DivMS
Posts: 788
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

lethargilistic wrote: November 10th, 2018, 9:04 pm I'd like to read Section 30, "The Law Of Property - Part 1."
Thanks Mike! :D
Divya
linny
Posts: 15363
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny »

Divya and Mike,
When PLing section 37 I'm finding a lot of missing text. The text seems to be references which likely have common legal rules for reading them however I don't know those rules. Before I PL the entire section I wanted to ask two questions.
Divya,
Do you want these corrections? If so, are you able to provide guidance for how they should be read?

Mike,
If the above answer is yes, are you willing to make the corrections?

Partial PL notes
1:48 missing text – Leges Henrici Primi, V. 28. (Thorpe’s Ancient Laws and Institutes of England, I. 511.) Coke’s Third Institute, f.6.
2:18 missing text – 2. Adversus Extraneos Vitiosa Possessio Prodesse Solet. D. 41. 2. 53.
2:39 missing text – 3. Apices Juris Non Sunt Jura. 10 Co. Rep. 126. Cf. D. 17.1.29.4: non congruity de apicibus juris dispatare.
3:49 missing text – The complementary rule of extensive interpretation is, Ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus. See Vangerow, I. sect. 25.
3:51 missing text – 5. Cogitationis Poenam Nemo Patitur. D. 48. 19.18.
4:12 missing text – 6. Communis Hrror Facit Jus. Coke’s Fourth Inst. F. 240. Cf. D. 33.10.3.5: Error jus facit.
lethargilistic
Posts: 266
Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
Contact:

Post by lethargilistic »

Agh, I meant to make a note of that. Yes, I am willing to make the additions if requested, but the case numbers seemed more like footnotes than text.
Mike
TriciaG
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 60512
Joined: June 15th, 2008, 10:30 pm
Location: Toronto, ON (but Minnesotan to age 32)

Post by TriciaG »

I'll claim sections 36 and 38, please. I might come back to do 35, but it has a lot of terms in a lot of languages - I'll have to work myself up to it and do some research before taking that one on! :lol:
Serial novel: The Wandering Jew
Medieval England meets Civil War Americans: Centuries Apart
Humor: My Lady Nicotine
DivMS
Posts: 788
Joined: June 14th, 2013, 11:15 pm

Post by DivMS »

linny wrote: November 11th, 2018, 6:46 am Divya and Mike,
When PLing section 37 I'm finding a lot of missing text. The text seems to be references which likely have common legal rules for reading them however I don't know those rules. Before I PL the entire section I wanted to ask two questions.
Divya,
Do you want these corrections? If so, are you able to provide guidance for how they should be read?

Mike,
If the above answer is yes, are you willing to make the corrections?

Partial PL notes
1:48 missing text – Leges Henrici Primi, V. 28. (Thorpe’s Ancient Laws and Institutes of England, I. 511.) Coke’s Third Institute, f.6.
2:18 missing text – 2. Adversus Extraneos Vitiosa Possessio Prodesse Solet. D. 41. 2. 53.
2:39 missing text – 3. Apices Juris Non Sunt Jura. 10 Co. Rep. 126. Cf. D. 17.1.29.4: non congruity de apicibus juris dispatare.
3:49 missing text – The complementary rule of extensive interpretation is, Ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus. See Vangerow, I. sect. 25.
3:51 missing text – 5. Cogitationis Poenam Nemo Patitur. D. 48. 19.18.
4:12 missing text – 6. Communis Hrror Facit Jus. Coke’s Fourth Inst. F. 240. Cf. D. 33.10.3.5: Error jus facit.
Apologies for the late reply. I just returned from a camping trip.

Regarding these references, I agree with Mike. They look more like footnotes so I don't think they need to be recorded. Just the maxim and its explanation is enough :D
Divya
Post Reply