COMPLETE Jurisprudence by John Salmond-mas
And here is 8 for PL
https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_08_salmond_128kb.mp3 [26:12]
https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_08_salmond_128kb.mp3 [26:12]
Thanks,
Michael
"Always read something that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it." — P.J. O’Rourke
Michael
"Always read something that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it." — P.J. O’Rourke
Hello Michael,
Section 8 is PL OK. I really enjoyed your pacing.
Section 8 is PL OK. I really enjoyed your pacing.
Linette's DPL list
Readers Wanted: Arabian Nights Problem of the Ages Home Education DR-Dialogue of the Dead - Lucian
Readers Wanted: Arabian Nights Problem of the Ages Home Education DR-Dialogue of the Dead - Lucian
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
- Contact:
I would like Section 37 "Appendix III: Maxims of the Law", please!
Mike
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
- Contact:
Mike
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
- Contact:
I'd like to read Section 30, "The Law Of Property - Part 1."
Mike
lethargilistic wrote: ↑November 10th, 2018, 8:56 pm Section 37!
https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/jurisprudence_37_salmond_128kb.mp3 (15:59)
Thanks Mike!lethargilistic wrote: ↑November 10th, 2018, 9:04 pm I'd like to read Section 30, "The Law Of Property - Part 1."
Divya
Divya and Mike,
When PLing section 37 I'm finding a lot of missing text. The text seems to be references which likely have common legal rules for reading them however I don't know those rules. Before I PL the entire section I wanted to ask two questions.
Divya,
Do you want these corrections? If so, are you able to provide guidance for how they should be read?
Mike,
If the above answer is yes, are you willing to make the corrections?
Partial PL notes
1:48 missing text – Leges Henrici Primi, V. 28. (Thorpe’s Ancient Laws and Institutes of England, I. 511.) Coke’s Third Institute, f.6.
2:18 missing text – 2. Adversus Extraneos Vitiosa Possessio Prodesse Solet. D. 41. 2. 53.
2:39 missing text – 3. Apices Juris Non Sunt Jura. 10 Co. Rep. 126. Cf. D. 17.1.29.4: non congruity de apicibus juris dispatare.
3:49 missing text – The complementary rule of extensive interpretation is, Ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus. See Vangerow, I. sect. 25.
3:51 missing text – 5. Cogitationis Poenam Nemo Patitur. D. 48. 19.18.
4:12 missing text – 6. Communis Hrror Facit Jus. Coke’s Fourth Inst. F. 240. Cf. D. 33.10.3.5: Error jus facit.
When PLing section 37 I'm finding a lot of missing text. The text seems to be references which likely have common legal rules for reading them however I don't know those rules. Before I PL the entire section I wanted to ask two questions.
Divya,
Do you want these corrections? If so, are you able to provide guidance for how they should be read?
Mike,
If the above answer is yes, are you willing to make the corrections?
Partial PL notes
1:48 missing text – Leges Henrici Primi, V. 28. (Thorpe’s Ancient Laws and Institutes of England, I. 511.) Coke’s Third Institute, f.6.
2:18 missing text – 2. Adversus Extraneos Vitiosa Possessio Prodesse Solet. D. 41. 2. 53.
2:39 missing text – 3. Apices Juris Non Sunt Jura. 10 Co. Rep. 126. Cf. D. 17.1.29.4: non congruity de apicibus juris dispatare.
3:49 missing text – The complementary rule of extensive interpretation is, Ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus. See Vangerow, I. sect. 25.
3:51 missing text – 5. Cogitationis Poenam Nemo Patitur. D. 48. 19.18.
4:12 missing text – 6. Communis Hrror Facit Jus. Coke’s Fourth Inst. F. 240. Cf. D. 33.10.3.5: Error jus facit.
Linette's DPL list
Readers Wanted: Arabian Nights Problem of the Ages Home Education DR-Dialogue of the Dead - Lucian
Readers Wanted: Arabian Nights Problem of the Ages Home Education DR-Dialogue of the Dead - Lucian
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: July 24th, 2018, 3:38 am
- Contact:
Agh, I meant to make a note of that. Yes, I am willing to make the additions if requested, but the case numbers seemed more like footnotes than text.
Mike
-
- LibriVox Admin Team
- Posts: 60586
- Joined: June 15th, 2008, 10:30 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON (but Minnesotan to age 32)
I'll claim sections 36 and 38, please. I might come back to do 35, but it has a lot of terms in a lot of languages - I'll have to work myself up to it and do some research before taking that one on!
Serial novel: The Wandering Jew
Medieval England meets Civil War Americans: Centuries Apart
Humor: My Lady Nicotine
Medieval England meets Civil War Americans: Centuries Apart
Humor: My Lady Nicotine
Apologies for the late reply. I just returned from a camping trip.linny wrote: ↑November 11th, 2018, 6:46 am Divya and Mike,
When PLing section 37 I'm finding a lot of missing text. The text seems to be references which likely have common legal rules for reading them however I don't know those rules. Before I PL the entire section I wanted to ask two questions.
Divya,
Do you want these corrections? If so, are you able to provide guidance for how they should be read?
Mike,
If the above answer is yes, are you willing to make the corrections?
Partial PL notes
1:48 missing text – Leges Henrici Primi, V. 28. (Thorpe’s Ancient Laws and Institutes of England, I. 511.) Coke’s Third Institute, f.6.
2:18 missing text – 2. Adversus Extraneos Vitiosa Possessio Prodesse Solet. D. 41. 2. 53.
2:39 missing text – 3. Apices Juris Non Sunt Jura. 10 Co. Rep. 126. Cf. D. 17.1.29.4: non congruity de apicibus juris dispatare.
3:49 missing text – The complementary rule of extensive interpretation is, Ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus. See Vangerow, I. sect. 25.
3:51 missing text – 5. Cogitationis Poenam Nemo Patitur. D. 48. 19.18.
4:12 missing text – 6. Communis Hrror Facit Jus. Coke’s Fourth Inst. F. 240. Cf. D. 33.10.3.5: Error jus facit.
Regarding these references, I agree with Mike. They look more like footnotes so I don't think they need to be recorded. Just the maxim and its explanation is enough
Divya