[COMPLETE]: Geneva Conventions - ans

Solo or group recordings that are finished and fully available for listeners
Post Reply
Toeknee
Posts: 186
Joined: March 28th, 2015, 5:20 am

Post by Toeknee » December 1st, 2016, 7:27 pm

Hi everyone,

Just a reminder to post recordings and what not (:
Even if you haven't recorded, please do just check in and confirm that you're still alive!
I dearly miss you all, it's awfully lonely in this BC office...

Toeknee

commonsparrow3
Posts: 2204
Joined: January 17th, 2013, 9:16 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

Post by commonsparrow3 » December 1st, 2016, 10:24 pm

The thought of you sitting in the lonely BC office watching dust gather on the computer is just too sad. Suppose I liven things up a bit by claiming sections 20 and 29?

Toeknee
Posts: 186
Joined: March 28th, 2015, 5:20 am

Post by Toeknee » December 5th, 2016, 4:09 am

You know my life too well ):
The dust was even starting to gather on the computer screen!

Noted, sections 20 and 29

kathrinee
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 7090
Joined: May 14th, 2012, 5:09 am
Location: in the sun

Post by kathrinee » January 4th, 2017, 12:30 pm

I'd like to claim sections 10-12, please :)
Kathrine

~~ Thank you for your patience! ~~

Fairytales in Danish, Swedish, or Norwegian


Toeknee
Posts: 186
Joined: March 28th, 2015, 5:20 am

Post by Toeknee » January 4th, 2017, 1:33 pm

Wilcooooo

Nice to see some people here (:

commonsparrow3
Posts: 2204
Joined: January 17th, 2013, 9:16 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

Post by commonsparrow3 » January 10th, 2017, 1:07 pm

Here's Section 20 - (length 13:55)
https://librivox.org/uploads/annise/geneva_conventions_1949_20_icrc_128kb.mp3

Sorry for the long delay. December got a bit crazy and I had to let LV go onto a back burner. But I'm back! Section 29 is recorded and will follow as soon as I get it edited. :)

linny
Posts: 8196
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » January 10th, 2017, 1:31 pm

Hi Maria,
Glad to have you back! Section 20 is PL OK! :thumbs:

Toeknee
Posts: 186
Joined: March 28th, 2015, 5:20 am

Post by Toeknee » January 10th, 2017, 2:32 pm

Thanks all, have seen and will update

Toeknee
Posts: 186
Joined: March 28th, 2015, 5:20 am

Post by Toeknee » January 10th, 2017, 2:35 pm

Never mind, it's magically done!

linny
Posts: 8196
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » January 10th, 2017, 2:46 pm

Lol. DPL's have magic powers :wink:

Toeknee
Posts: 186
Joined: March 28th, 2015, 5:20 am

Post by Toeknee » January 10th, 2017, 3:55 pm

Oh...
Oh no, IM BEING MADE REDUNDANT!!!
This is unacceptable, BCs have rights too ):
this won't be the last you hear of this, the BC union will be on your case

annise
LibriVox Admin Team
Posts: 28909
Joined: April 3rd, 2008, 3:55 am
Location: Melbourne,Australia

Post by annise » January 10th, 2017, 4:58 pm

:roll: Just what we need - a demarcation dispute :roll: :help:

Anne
Our objective is to make all books in the public domain available, for free, in audio format on the internet. - Hugh McGuire.

linny
Posts: 8196
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » January 10th, 2017, 6:56 pm

:lol: :lol:

commonsparrow3
Posts: 2204
Joined: January 17th, 2013, 9:16 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

Post by commonsparrow3 » January 12th, 2017, 3:28 pm

Here's Section 29 - (length 22:55)
https://librivox.org/uploads/annise/geneva_conventions_1949_29_icrc_128kb.mp3

There appeared to be some obvious typographical errors in the text, where the marginal "titles" were listed in the wrong places for Articles 144, 145, 146, and 147. Which title went with which article was clearly mixed up. Article 144 discussed "disseminating the text of the convention as widely as possible", but the marginal gloss was called "II: Grave Breaches", and should have gone with Article 147, which was a list of circumstances constituting grave breaches, while Article 144's title "Dissemination of the Convention" was attached to Article 145, which was actually about Translations, Etc...

I took the liberty of correcting the mixup in my reading. I hope this falls within the acceptable area of "correcting obvious typos", and is allowable. But if you would prefer the titles to be read as written, (even though utterly confusing that way!), I'll do a cut/paste to put them back in that order.

linny
Posts: 8196
Joined: November 5th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by linny » January 12th, 2017, 5:01 pm

Hi Maria,
Section 29 is PL ok as it is but let's wait to hear from Toeknee on if your modifications are ok.

Post Reply