COMPLETE Pamela vol 2 by Samuel Richardson-mas

linny · Post by **linny** » March 19th, 2017, 2:21 pm

linny wrote:Jim,
I don't think I would enjoy her as a sister-in-law. "Here, I have chosen the names of your first 8 children, the rest you may name." No wonder there is a saying that women are crazy. Good grief.

Section 56 is PL OK.

I found this quote back on page 14. I'm confused as to why it says it needs PL again. I did listen, knew I had heard it before and searched the thread to find this. Any ideas why it's back as needing PL? I left it that way although I believe it should be toggled to PL OK.

linny · Post by **linny** » March 19th, 2017, 2:42 pm

Jim,
53 and 55 are both PL OK.

Section 57 has a PL note but I'll let you decided what to do with it.

9:32 – the slightest of duplicates. - But, my dear lady, Miss Darnford has had those early advantages from conversation, which I had not; and so must never expect to know how to deport myself with that modest freedom and ease, which I know I want, and shall always want, although some of my partial favourers think I do not.

It isn’t distracting. Take a listen, it may be better to leave it than try and edit.

neecheelok70 · Post by **neecheelok70** » March 19th, 2017, 4:35 pm

https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/pamelavolume2_57_richardson_128kb.mp3 13.52 KB 14:25

HERE IT IS. NO TROUBLE. Jim

linny · Post by **linny** » March 19th, 2017, 4:53 pm

That was fast! Spot check PL OK.

wib66 · Post by **wib66** » March 20th, 2017, 3:38 pm

linny wrote:
linny wrote:Jim,
I don't think I would enjoy her as a sister-in-law. "Here, I have chosen the names of your first 8 children, the rest you may name." No wonder there is a saying that women are crazy. Good grief.

Section 56 is PL OK.
I found this quote back on page 14. I'm confused as to why it says it needs PL again. I did listen, knew I had heard it before and searched the thread to find this. Any ideas why it's back as needing PL? I left it that way although I believe it should be toggled to PL OK.

Not sure I may have changed it by mistake when I was putting in sections. Have now set is as PL OK thanks

wib66 · Post by **wib66** » March 20th, 2017, 3:39 pm

thanks everyone for sections and PL ing

neecheelok70 · Post by **neecheelok70** » March 20th, 2017, 7:03 pm

I can do 59, 60, and 61. I'm talking sections.

wib66 · Post by **wib66** » March 21st, 2017, 11:21 am

neecheelok70 wrote:I can do 59, 60, and 61. I'm talking sections.

thanks will sign you up to those

neecheelok70 · Post by **neecheelok70** » April 5th, 2017, 6:48 pm

https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/pamelavolume2_59_richardson_128kb.mp3 6.67 KB 7:06
https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/pamelavolume2_60_richardson_128kb.mp3 13.64 KB 14:33
Jim

wib66 · Post by **wib66** » April 6th, 2017, 6:16 am

neecheelok70 wrote:https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/pamelavolume2_59_richardson_128kb.mp3 6.67 KB 7:06
https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/pamelavolume2_60_richardson_128kb.mp3 13.64 KB 14:33
Jim

Thanks Jim

linny · Post by **linny** » April 6th, 2017, 7:08 am

Jim,
Sections 59 and 60 are both PL OK!

neecheelok70 · Post by **neecheelok70** » April 6th, 2017, 7:54 am

Thanks. I'm going to try to get to Gil tonight.

wib66 · Post by **wib66** » April 6th, 2017, 3:51 pm

thanks linny and Jim

neecheelok70 · Post by **neecheelok70** » April 9th, 2017, 10:11 am

https://librivox.org/uploads/maryannspiegel/pamelavolume2_61_richardson_128kb.mp3 7.76 KB 8:16
Jim

neecheelok70 · Post by **neecheelok70** » April 9th, 2017, 10:13 am

And may I have 77, 80, 81, and 82?