Paul is now DPL - it may take a little time for that to update - it depends on where it is in the update cycle.
Please do not flag either the presence or absence of the _128kb in this project only - I want to do that when I am cataloging rather than change them in my folder and in the MW.
I do actually check how things are going in all my MC projects - that is why I restrict the number I pick up
Hello pattymarie,
Apologies for not replying sooner but I was having difficulties logging in and navigating the forum. Thank you for your kind message. I will take your advice and look for any available sections once I have completed the recording. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
alessandroj wrote: ↑August 10th, 2022, 2:50 am
Hello pattymarie,
Apologies for not replying sooner but I was having difficulties logging in and navigating the forum. Thank you for your kind message. I will take your advice and look for any available sections once I have completed the recording. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
I am sorry for you to miss out on what must have been your first choice, but there is a lot of good material left unclaimed so far. I look forward to your getting set up to participate.
Do we need to read the footnotes and the text in the gray boxes? I finished recording my first section and I did not include these, let me know if I need to and I will do so in future sections and record in this section's ones when I edit or if I was right to ignore them
Hi, Michael. Just a couple of things that need correction.
~4:34 - heard: Sutherland -> text: Sunderland
~7:41 - heard: Chancellor of ech-queer -> text: Chancellor of the Exchequer (pron: ex-checker)
~7:53 - heard: for doing of -> text: for the doings of
~7:59 & ~8:08 - heard: Sutherland -> text: Sunderland
~8:17 - heard: Chancellor of etcheker -> text: Chancellor of the Exchequer (pron: ex-checker)
~10:57 - heard: member of group members -> text: member or group of members
Inkell wrote: ↑August 10th, 2022, 5:23 am
Do we need to read the footnotes and the text in the gray boxes? I finished recording my first section and I did not include these, let me know if I need to and I will do so in future sections and record in this section's ones when I edit or if I was right to ignore them
No, you don't need to include either of those. I never thought to say anything about them, and most readers have included the sub-section titles in the gray boxes, which is fine, but neither they nor the footnotes are required.
I'm not sure whether this constitutes a significant enough change in the meaning of a sentence, but at ~13:16 I hear "indeterminable," whereas the text says "interminable."
Also (but not significant enough to require changes,) when a British person's or place's name ends in '-ham,' the sound is reduced to '-Əm' (the schwa - Ə - is a short 'uh' sound.) Therefore, Buckingham is pronounced 'BU-king-Əm.'
I'm not sure whether this constitutes a significant enough change in the meaning of a sentence, but at ~13:16 I hear "indeterminable," whereas the text says "interminable."
Also (but not significant enough to require changes,) when a British person's or place's name ends in '-ham,' the sound is reduced to '-Əm' (the schwa - Ə - is a short 'uh' sound.) Therefore, Buckingham is pronounced 'BU-king-Əm.'
annise wrote: ↑August 9th, 2022, 6:07 pm
Paul is now DPL - it may take a little time for that to update - it depends on where it is in the update cycle.
Please do not flag either the presence or absence of the _128kb in this project only - I want to do that when I am cataloging rather than change them in my folder and in the MW.
I do actually check how things are going in all my MC projects - that is why I restrict the number I pick up
Anne
Should I have some extra access to the MW to indicate "See PL Notes," "PL OK," etc?
