[Complete] A Collection of Supreme Court Opinions - lt

soupy · Post by **soupy** » April 19th, 2019, 9:15 am

I took sections 21-22

Craig

GregGiordano · Post by **GregGiordano** » April 21st, 2019, 6:47 am

May I claim Section 17?

Thanks!

Greg

soupy · Post by **soupy** » April 21st, 2019, 8:06 am

Section 17 is yours Greg

Thanks
Craig

Post by **ColleenMc** » April 21st, 2019, 10:03 am

PL of Section 19 (WV State Board of Ed v. Barnette):

Nicely read, I like your pace and emphasis!

4:43 and 4:53 - note 3 and note 4 had info I thought was interesting and may be worth including but I don't insist -- up to reader.

6:02 - "injunction" - I hear "injunctions"

7:34 - "Fourteenth amendment of the Federal Constitution - the word Federal was omitted.

8:37 - "rights of others to do so" I hear "rights to others to do so" - I'm not sure if that changes the meaning enough to require it to be changed, but I'm noting it (there were other similar tiny word changes that I didn't think changed the meaning at all, and I skipped those)

11:31 - "followings" - I hear "followers" (this may not be a significant change worth fixing)

12:25 - "this court" - I hear "his court"

16:19 - "presents" - I hear "require"

16:57 - Note 15! I'm torn here -- on one hand, that quote in the footnote is gold, and I would love to hear it included; on the other hand, the long list of citations following it would have to be read as well, and that is booooring. So if it's possible to include the quote only, I would include this footnote, otherwise leave it omitted.

16:57 - between the Note 15 and Note 16 citations, text was omitted - reading skips to the text that starts after note 16. Missing text goes from "It is not necessary..." to "...unquestioned general rule"

17:41 - "problem" - I hear "power"

18:44 - "validly" - I hear "validity"

19:44 - "officially" - I hear "official"

23:54 - "transmitting" - I hear "submitting"

24:52 - "on such slender" - I hear "by such slender"

28:08 - "some end thought essential" - I hear "strong end thought essentially"

28:34 - "As first and moderate methods" - I hear "At first the moderate methods"

Colleen

Post by **ColleenMc** » April 21st, 2019, 11:18 am

I've PL'd section 23 (Berger v. New York).

I like your expressive reading! Here are the corrections I noticed:

--Your recording is 82.0 Db, it needs to be amplified to be at least 86, and 89 is preferred.

--00:55 - include the citation of the "NY Code" here because it is the law the decision is considering.

--5:06 - small hesitation

--11:18 - Weeks v. United States - omit the numerical part of the citation.

--The biggest change needed is including "Quote" before all longer quotations (more than a few words) and "End of quote" at the conclusion of each quotation. To make it easier, I limited this change in this recording to just the quotations that are long enough to be indented. These occur at:

9:36
10:12
11:20
14:31
14:58
15:25
16:01
16:24
16:46
17:14
17:46
18:01
18:23
18:40
19:25
21:41
22:23
22:57
25:56
29:57
31:23
32:46

It's not as complicated as the list makes it look -- easiest to record "quote" and "end of quote" once and then just cut/paste it at the beginning and end of each of the quotes.

Let me know if you have any questions and I'll be whatever help I can.

Colleen

soupy · Post by **soupy** » April 22nd, 2019, 9:38 am

Thanks for the careful PL job Colleen

https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/supremecourtopinions_19_unitedstatessupremecourt_128kb.mp3

36:29

PL of Section 19 (WV State Board of Ed v. Barnette):

Nicely read, I like your pace and emphasis!

4:43 and 4:53 - note 3 and note 4 had info I thought was interesting and may be worth including but I don't insist -- up to reader. added footnotes

6:02 - "injunction" - I hear "injunctions" fixed

7:34 - "Fourteenth amendment of the Federal Constitution - the word Federal was omitted. fixed

8:37 - "rights of others to do so" I hear "rights to others to do so" - I'm not sure if that changes the meaning enough to require it to be changed, but I'm noting it (there were other similar tiny word changes that I didn't think changed the meaning at all, and I skipped those) fixed

11:31 - "followings" - I hear "followers" (this may not be a significant change worth fixing) Left this one as is

12:25 - "this court" - I hear "his court" fixed

16:19 - "presents" - I hear "require" fixed

16:57 - Note 15! I'm torn here -- on one hand, that quote in the footnote is gold, and I would love to hear it included; on the other hand, the long list of citations following it would have to be read as well, and that is booooring. So if it's possible to include the quote only, I would include this footnote, otherwise leave it omitted. Added at 17:00

16:57 - between the Note 15 and Note 16 citations, text was omitted - reading skips to the text that starts after note 16. Missing text goes from "It is not necessary..." to "...unquestioned general rule" fixed starts after footnote 15

17:41 - "problem" - I hear "power" fixed

18:44 - "validly" - I hear "validity" fxied

19:44 - "officially" - I hear "official" fixed

23:54 - "transmitting" - I hear "submitting" fixed

24:52 - "on such slender" - I hear "by such slender" fixed

28:08 - "some end thought essential" - I hear "strong end thought essentially" fixed

28:34 - "As first and moderate methods" - I hear "At first the moderate methods" fixed

Craig

Post by **ColleenMc** » April 22nd, 2019, 1:22 pm

Craig,

One small edit missed. At 31:22 - "some end" still sounds like "strong end". Otherwise all good!

Colleen

soupy · Post by **soupy** » April 22nd, 2019, 2:11 pm

Correction
https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/supremecourtopinions_19_unitedstatessupremecourt_128kb.mp3

36:29

Craig

Post by **ColleenMc** » April 22nd, 2019, 2:18 pm

Section 19 is now PL OK!

Colleen

Post by **ColleenMc** » April 25th, 2019, 7:08 am

Just to let you know -- I have a bad cold this week and am going out of town next week through around 5/8. If my cold and voice improve between now and when I leave town, I will try to get this recorded, otherwise it will be around mid-May. If you need to reassign this, that's okay.

I will keep on doing the PL-ing as it comes in.

Colleen

soupy · Post by **soupy** » April 25th, 2019, 7:37 am

We can wait for you Colleen

Get well soon.

Craig

elsieselwyn · Post by **elsieselwyn** » May 3rd, 2019, 4:54 am

Can I have 11-15?

soupy · Post by **soupy** » May 3rd, 2019, 6:20 am

11-15 are yours elsieselwyn

Thanks for taking that on

Craig

tparker · Post by **tparker** » May 5th, 2019, 12:10 pm

Who is the MC for this project?

Thanks

KIBBONAFIDE · Post by **KIBBONAFIDE** » May 5th, 2019, 12:14 pm

tparker wrote: ↑May 5th, 2019, 12:10 pm Who is the MC for this project?

Thanks

From the first post of this project:

You'll need to select the MC, which for this project is: lt - Lynnet

Thanks!