Above is the file with Brown dropped from the title and anonymous put in. I do agree with your statement about the author not being as clear so anonymous was a good call on your part.
Sue Anderson wrote: ↑May 16th, 2018, 3:50 pmHi April, Thanks for the Black Walnut, and Progress! To answer your question about the Progress essay, it's ok by me to leave the actual recording the way you read it, with the attribution to "Professor Brown." But if you would be so kind, would you change the author in your file from "Brown" to "Anonymous," and re-upload the file?adr6090 wrote: ↑May 16th, 2018, 3:14 pm
Here are 2 separate additions for this thread. My question for you is about the 2nd recording above, Progress. I did not see the author as in the first one. I did mention a gentleman that was speaking with someone else though that name was not given. Please do let me know if that was okay.
My reasoning here is that "Professor Brown" is, in the essay, being referred to by an anonymous author in a more-or-less apocryphal sense; indeed there might have been a real professor by that last name, but we don't actually know that. Also, Professor Brown's story is not given in his own words, but those words "remembered" by the anonymous author.