[COMPLETE] Neither Here nor There by Oliver Herford - kd

Solo or group recordings that are finished and fully available for listeners
Post Reply
deongines
Posts: 2136
Joined: November 2nd, 2012, 4:14 pm
Location: Salt Lake City UT

Post by deongines »

Can I claim sections 9 and 25? Thanks Deon
Turning it over in your mind will not plough the field.
lannonx23
Posts: 53
Joined: December 19th, 2017, 11:46 am
Location: Star, ID, USA
Contact:

Post by lannonx23 »

And I would please like to claim Section 31 - Say It With Askterisks.

Thanks!
-Mindle Hastings
Catalog Page
NemoR
Posts: 2520
Joined: February 27th, 2017, 1:48 pm
Location: The Present

Post by NemoR »

lannonx23 wrote:
Hi Nemo!

I'm happy to! In fact, here's the file, reduced by 3.3, I believe: https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3
Section 24
File Duration: 03:38

Let me know how that sounds. I got ReplayGain and learned how to use it, so I should be on top of this going forward. I appreciate you guiding me! Please continue to give me feedback like this! It's what I'm looking for.
Perfect!

Thanks Mindle!

Nemo
Nemo

Thoreau - “Our truest life is when we are in dreams awake."
lannonx23
Posts: 53
Joined: December 19th, 2017, 11:46 am
Location: Star, ID, USA
Contact:

Post by lannonx23 »

I've got a question on how to read some stuff in section 31. The title is "Say It With an Asterisk," and the author is literally playing around with asterisks in the writing. Here's an example section:
On page 133 of Baedeker’s Berlin, “Furniture From the Boudoir of Queen Marie Antoinette” has two stars, ** while “Elijah in the Desert,” on page 108, has, in addition to all his other troubles, to worry along with one star.

And that is not the worst of it.

On page 163, “a well-preserved Archæopteryx in Solnhofen slate,” to me by all odds the most interesting object in Berlin, has no star at all! * * *
The asterisks in the passage do not refer to an actual footnote. The first example comes right after he says "two stars" (followed immediately by "**"), so I might be tempted to exclude them, but the last example, "...no star at all! * * *", the asterisks are obviously there on purpose for exaggerated comedic effect. Oh, and to make it clear, he uses "star" and "asterisk" interchangeably throughout the section.

I think I'm going to read all the asterisks as the literal word "asterisk." So, I would read the last sentence in the above quotation as "..has no star at all! Asterisk, asterisk, asterisk." Likewise, I'd read out the two asterisks after "two stars".

Any thoughts? I'm happy to read it however the BC or more experienced readers would recommend.

Thanks!
-Mindle Hastings
Catalog Page
silverquill
Posts: 28992
Joined: May 25th, 2013, 9:11 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by silverquill »

I've assigned Section 31 to you. I knew it was going to be a challenge. I think your approach is good in those two instances, read them as "asterisk" each time. There are two other similar instances near the end of the section that can be read the same way.

The asterisks that are used, creatively, as dividers in the text should be ignored. There is just no good way to read them that would add anything to the listening experience. There are often visual elements, esp. in poetry, that we just cannot convey in our reading.

And, don't forget the end of book closing.

Thanks for taking this challenging section! :clap:
HE IS RISEN
~ Larry
silverquill
Posts: 28992
Joined: May 25th, 2013, 9:11 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by silverquill »

deongines wrote:Can I claim sections 9 and 25? Thanks Deon
Yes, you are in the MW for these.
Thanks for joining this project.
HE IS RISEN
~ Larry
lannonx23
Posts: 53
Joined: December 19th, 2017, 11:46 am
Location: Star, ID, USA
Contact:

Post by lannonx23 »

silverquill wrote:I've assigned Section 31 to you. I knew it was going to be a challenge. I think your approach is good in those two instances, read them as "asterisk" each time. There are two other similar instances near the end of the section that can be read the same way.

The asterisks that are used, creatively, as dividers in the text should be ignored. There is just no good way to read them that would add anything to the listening experience. There are often visual elements, esp. in poetry, that we just cannot convey in our reading.

And, don't forget the end of book closing.

Thanks for taking this challenging section! :clap:
Haha, thanks, Larry, and you're welcome! I appreciate the input. I almost mentioned the section dividers in my message (I agree--ignoring the asterisks in them sounds like the right approach), but my initial message was already long enough I didn't want to grow and complicate it any further. Thanks for clarifying that point without me even bringing it up!
-Mindle Hastings
Catalog Page
DrPGould
Posts: 2785
Joined: December 12th, 2016, 9:27 pm

Post by DrPGould »

Larry:

Here are the links for Sections 4, 14, and 26. Their respective running times are 3:42, 4:29, and 3:04.

https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3
https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3
https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3

Many thanks,

Philip
Back after 8/15. In the hands of the medicos.
NemoR
Posts: 2520
Joined: February 27th, 2017, 1:48 pm
Location: The Present

Post by NemoR »

DrPGould wrote:Larry:

Here are the links for Sections 4, 14, and 26. Their respective running times are 3:42, 4:29, and 3:04.

https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3
https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3
https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3

Many thanks,

Philip
Nice job! ... all three are PL OK & in the MW.

Nemo
Nemo

Thoreau - “Our truest life is when we are in dreams awake."
Bobbin
Posts: 8
Joined: December 2nd, 2017, 3:23 am

Post by Bobbin »

Bobbin wrote:Hi! I'd like to claim sections 8 and 9 please.
OK! I have all the sections I asked to claim ready for upload. For now, I just uploaded the first one, chapter 8, and if you OK this one, I'll upload the rest in one go. Just making sure it sounds allright and everything is in order (as it's my first live upload after the test). :)

https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3

Please note that I did ask a few days ago to do chapter 9 as well, as quoted above, however - I now see it's assigned to someone else. Is it still possible to change that? I already recorded it as well...
silverquill
Posts: 28992
Joined: May 25th, 2013, 9:11 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by silverquill »

Bobbin wrote:
Bobbin wrote:Hi! I'd like to claim sections 8 and 9 please.
OK! I have all the sections I asked to claim ready for upload. For now, I just uploaded the first one, chapter 8, and if you OK this one, I'll upload the rest in one go. Just making sure it sounds allright and everything is in order (as it's my first live upload after the test). :)

https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3

Please note that I did ask a few days ago to do chapter 9 as well, as quoted above, however - I now see it's assigned to someone else. Is it still possible to change that? I already recorded it as well...
Sorry about missing you for 9. It is yours.

I do appreciate your posting your first file for evaluation. This will save us some time.
I do love your reading, and not the slight echo mentioned in your test evaluation, at it is perfectly acceptable, so I wouldn't change anything about that. Overall it is quite a pleasant sound.

There are two technical issues, however, that need attention.

The easiest to fix is the ending silence. It need to be 5 seconds and you have only one second. For this, you can just copy and paste the one second to get the five. When recording, just let the recording run for a little longer than five seconds and then trim it.

More serious is the high volume. Our LibriVox target is 89dB with a range of 86-92dB Yours measures 94.3dB This would also evident looking at the wave form which also shows numerous red spikes on my Audacity display.

To correct this, I used the Amplify feature in Audacity and set it to -5, but it would be better to adjust your mic settings to get it closer to the desired 89dB. I usually do some volume adjusting, but the less needed, the better.

I use two tools to help. The first is an Audacity plug-in called ReplayGain. After recording, I just run this and it tells me how many dB adjustment is needed, and then I use the amplify feature in Audacity. When I PL pieces, I check the technical parameters with a little program called Checker written specifically for LibriVox. It checks volume, length, bit rate, etc. There are links to both of these programs in the LV wikis.

Oh, one other thing. Please post the file length along with your link. This one measures 4:44.

Once you have these technical aspects well in hand, you'll be a seasoned pro. You are off to a good start. I look forward to the rest of your recordings.

ETA: Make the necessary changes, then upload the new file under the same name, then post the link here again along with the new file length.
HE IS RISEN
~ Larry
DrPGould
Posts: 2785
Joined: December 12th, 2016, 9:27 pm

Post by DrPGould »

Here are the links for Sections 10 and 30. Running times are (respectively) 5:46 and 9:04.

https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3
https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3

Many thanks,

Philip
Back after 8/15. In the hands of the medicos.
silverquill
Posts: 28992
Joined: May 25th, 2013, 9:11 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by silverquill »

DrPGould wrote:Here are the links for Sections 10 and 30. Running times are (respectively) 5:46 and 9:04.

https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3
https://librivox.org/uploads/kilteddrag ... _128kb.mp3

Many thanks,

Philip
Thank you so much!
In the MW Ready for PL
HE IS RISEN
~ Larry
deongines
Posts: 2136
Joined: November 2nd, 2012, 4:14 pm
Location: Salt Lake City UT

Post by deongines »

Turning it over in your mind will not plough the field.
silverquill
Posts: 28992
Joined: May 25th, 2013, 9:11 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by silverquill »

Thank you!
In the MW Ready for PL.
HE IS RISEN
~ Larry
Post Reply