one mention: I re-recorded and overwrote the:
> at 4:49 ( now is 4:44) : (p. 183 top): “there is room only for the neck” – you say “there is no room, except for the neck”. While I agree, it means the same, we still should not change what the author wrote
and I think it might have a different amplitude ... can u please advise on this part ? 10q
I think the sentence has been perfectly patched in and I don't hear a disturbing difference in volume. Also all the other stumbles excellently cut out and the new recordings nicely patched in. Wonderful correction. Super well done.
(I wish I had been as good at correcting my errors in my first few recordings.)
: PL ok
: PL ok
the end silence is down to 5 seconds now and the volume is ok, however the background noise has got amplified as well in the process. It’s ok for now I think, it's not too disturbing, but maybe one could consider a round of noise-cleaning after amplification next time.
Two notes still for the other two sections:
for Section 45
> volume is ok but 7 seconds at the end
are still there. Could you cut them down to 5 there please ?
for Section 57
> volume is below 86 dB, can you amplify by 3 dB
the rest is fine.