Thank you, Kevin!

Thank you, Kevin!
Hahaha! Indeed!Sue Anderson wrote: ↑August 6th, 2019, 8:39 amThank you, Kevin!A humorous essay with a great deal of truth!
Please be sure to hold off until the next collection (SNF069) with this, as we are strictly adhering to a 2-readings per person per SNF collection rule at this time... and no "worming in" with 3!KevinS wrote: ↑August 6th, 2019, 8:54 amHahaha! Indeed!Sue Anderson wrote: ↑August 6th, 2019, 8:39 amThank you, Kevin!A humorous essay with a great deal of truth!
I'm going to do one more for this collection. This time a horror story, of sorts. It's about book worms ... and not the good ones!
Hahaha! You're da boss!Sue Anderson wrote: ↑August 6th, 2019, 9:31 amPlease be sure to hold off until the next collection (SNF069) with this, as we are strictly adhering to a 2-readings per person per SNF collection rule at this time... and no "worming in" with 3!KevinS wrote: ↑August 6th, 2019, 8:54 amHahaha! Indeed!Sue Anderson wrote: ↑August 6th, 2019, 8:39 am
Thank you, Kevin!A humorous essay with a great deal of truth!
I'm going to do one more for this collection. This time a horror story, of sorts. It's about book worms ... and not the good ones!
Regards,
Thanks for the PL, Craig.soupy wrote: ↑August 5th, 2019, 6:56 pmThanks for the speech on liberalism in 1905 Silverquill![]()
A ew errors noted:
2:07 That the method of their going would be a masterpiece of tactical skill. Forgot to read the method
3:44 What lesson then are we to draw – you read they
11:43 And by referring the Alabama dispute to arbitration – you read by referring to the Alabama
15:32 Or crying out for lighter taxes and fewer of them? You read higher
16:22 We believe in that principle – you read I
17:12 Down to last spring – you read the last spring
Craig
Got back to this!soupy wrote: ↑August 3rd, 2019, 5:17 pmThanks for the Kangaroo court story Mike.
A few errors noted:
6:33 forgot end quote after “an intrinsic utilitarian function that is not merely to portray the appearance of the article or to convey information.”
7:05 forgot end quote after “is eligible for copyright if, when identified and imagined apart from the useful article, it would qualify as a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work either on its own or when fixed in some other tangible medium.”
8:09 after The second requirement, which is “ordinarily more difficult to satisfy,” requires “that the separately identified feature has the capacity to exist apart from the utilitarian aspects of the article.” Id. forgot to read this p. 7 (“In other words, the feature must be able to exist as its own pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work as defined in § 101 once it is imagined apart from the useful article.”)
13:51 A judge’s own aesthetic judgments must play no role in copyright analysis. After this forgot to read: See Star Athletica, 137 S. Ct. at 1015. “Our inquiry is limited to how the article and feature[s] are perceived, not how or why they were designed.”
17:05 Courts term this rare occurrence “merger,” forgot quote end quote
17:41 Here, copyrighting Rasta’s banana costume would not effectively monopolize the underlying idea because there are many other ways to make a costume resemble a banana. You read monopolizing
Craig
Craig, Whether you take a short-cut thru Google, or go the long-way around thru
Hi Chad, Thank you for this recording about the Church in Liverpool in the early 1800's!Horner94 wrote: ↑August 10th, 2019, 4:52 pmHello!
I have attempted another recording.
Author: James Aspinall (1795-1861).
Title: Liverpool a few years since
URL to text: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/40732/40732-h/40732-h.htm#page122
Below is my audio recording ready for PLing:
https://librivox.org/uploads/knotyouraveragejo/snf068_liverpoolafewyearssince_aspinall_cjph_128kb.mp3
Time: 13:27
I hope recording this portion of the text is okay. Any issues please let me know
Kind regards,
Chad