*******************************Anitazz wrote: ↑August 11th, 2019, 7:29 pm*********************hdcn wrote: ↑August 8th, 2019, 10:42 pmAnita, what is your feeling on this? Do you want to try to re-record? If so, please get with me first so that I can perhaps advise you on your setup and software settings. It's definitely a learning curve. The decision is yours, but feel free to PM me either way and we can discuss. Thanks,Anitazz wrote: ↑August 8th, 2019, 1:35 pm
Ugh! It is a new microphone and I think I may be over-compensating for a comment I received from a different project which indicated that the volume was noticeably inconsistent. I don't have a copy of the pre-cleanup... good idea though for future endeavors. Let me see what I can do. Thanks for the feedback. It's a learning process.
Anita
Jeff B.
Hi, Jeff--
I have uploaded a raw version of this section to https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/mansrights_09_dentoncridge_128kb.mp3
(27:59). I am assuming this is mostly an exercise in recording quality and determining the best way to process it. Normally, I proof-listen AFTER I do the clean-up steps, because there sometimes are little "thumps" on the recording, or some background "hum" that didn't get cleaned up like I wanted, so there could be a few more reading errors than usual this time around, since I'd rather do that when the piece is cleaned electronically. I'll be happy to do that if you can let me know what clean-up you think should be executed. Anyway, for a change, I didn't need to amplify as this came in about 89db (usually, it's about 83db). Not sure why; I don't remember changing anything. I appreciate the help. Thanks--
Anita
Hi, Jeff-- I've uploaded a newer version of Dream 9 with all (known) reading errors corrected. Let me know what, if any, corrections you would like me to apply. Thanks! Anita
https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/mansrights_09_dentoncridge_128kb.mp3 (27:31)