[COMPLETE] Watergate Report, Vol. 2 - tg

Ciufi · Post by **Ciufi** » January 11th, 2018, 2:30 pm

Here's section 26, 20:39 :

https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/watergatereport2_26_senate_128kb.mp3

Post by **TriciaG** » January 11th, 2018, 2:35 pm

Ooo, something to listen to while I prepare supper!

Ciufi · Post by **Ciufi** » January 11th, 2018, 3:00 pm

Lucky woman!

Post by **TriciaG** » January 11th, 2018, 3:30 pm

PL OK. Thanks again!

commonsparrow3 · Post by **commonsparrow3** » January 13th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Here is Section 1 - (Ch 4: Campaign Financing, part 1) - (length 19:25)

https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/watergatereport2_01_senate_128kb.mp3

Post by **TriciaG** » January 13th, 2018, 6:02 pm

Thank you, Maria!

Post by **TriciaG** » January 13th, 2018, 6:53 pm

Section 1 PL OK!

wildlindajohnson · Post by **wildlindajohnson** » January 14th, 2018, 9:59 am

I'll be glad to read Sections 7, 8, 9 and 10.

Post by **TriciaG** » January 14th, 2018, 4:39 pm

Thank you! You're in for 7-10.

commonsparrow3 · Post by **commonsparrow3** » January 15th, 2018, 3:07 pm

Here is Section 2 - (Ch 4: Campaign Financing, part 2) - (length 26:07)

https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/watergatereport2_02_senate_128kb.mp3

Post by **TriciaG** » January 15th, 2018, 3:10 pm

Thank you, lady!

EDIT: PL OK. Is that the same Steinbrenner that was owner of the Yankees?

(after a little searching) Yes, it is.

wildlindajohnson · Post by **wildlindajohnson** » January 16th, 2018, 1:36 pm

Here's Section 7:

https://librivox.org/uploads/triciag/watergatereport2_07_senate_128kb.mp3 [29:21]

Post by **TriciaG** » January 16th, 2018, 2:49 pm

Thank you, Linda!

Post by **TriciaG** » January 16th, 2018, 6:25 pm

7 PL OK. Are you just reading the footnotes you find interesting? I don't recall anyone else reading them; those readeres must not have thought they were interesting enough.

wildlindajohnson · Post by **wildlindajohnson** » January 16th, 2018, 6:30 pm

Oh! I looked for instructions concerning the footnotes but didn't find any. On another project, the readers were instructed to include footnotes that were informative and narrative and to disregard those which were simply bibliographic references. For this section, the footnotes seemed cogent, warranting inclusion. Would you prefer that I omit them? It's no problem either way; happy to oblige.