Thank you so much, Philip!DrPGould wrote:Larry:
I would be interested in DPL-ing this (and also in reading sections 15 & 17).
Many thanks,
Philip
Amy will put you in as DPL.
With that we are full and on our way, so get your recordings in!
Thank you so much, Philip!DrPGould wrote:Larry:
I would be interested in DPL-ing this (and also in reading sections 15 & 17).
Many thanks,
Philip
Philip is officially DPL now. Off to Readers Found. That was unbelievably quick!silverquill wrote:Thank you so much, Philip!DrPGould wrote:Larry:
I would be interested in DPL-ing this (and also in reading sections 15 & 17).
Many thanks,
Philip
Amy will put you in as DPL.
With that we are full and on our way, so get your recordings in!
Great! I'll try to PL tonight.DrPGould wrote:Larry:
Here is the link for Section 17. Running time is 3:25.
https://librivox.org/uploads/alg1001/tabletalk_17_luther_128kb.mp3
Note to Amy: Thanks! I'll get to work.
Many thanks,
Philip
This is PL OK! Thanks.DrPGould wrote:Larry:
Here is the link for Section 17. Running time is 3:25.
https://librivox.org/uploads/alg1001/tabletalk_17_luther_128kb.mp3
Philip
I would concur with this, except that I actually do find this harsh background noise to be unacceptable. I've taken the liberty of doing the noise reduction, which took two passes.DrPGould wrote:Gill:
Section 5 is PL-Ok! I do have a suggestion for future recordings, however. There is a persistent hum in the background which is almost at the level of being distracting. I think a run through the noise reduction utility would clear is up.
Nicely read.
Many thanks,
Philip
Most wonderful!DrPGould wrote:Larry:
https://librivox.org/uploads/alg1001/tabletalk_15_luther_128kb.mp3
Here is the link to Section 15. Running time is 16:46.
From now on, I'm all ears.
Many thanks,
Philip