Thanks Patrickpatrickjeaton wrote:Can you give me a slot in the Magic Window. I would like to contribute although I havent chosen what to read yet
Section 8 is yours.
Cheers
Thanks Patrickpatrickjeaton wrote:Can you give me a slot in the Magic Window. I would like to contribute although I havent chosen what to read yet
Thanks RuthRuthieG wrote:Algy, I've taken the liberty of allocating myself section 9, so that I could upload this before I retire for the night .
I'll move us over to Readers Wanted now.
Ruth
Thanks Marksjmarky wrote:Two more for you:
And, might I suggest name the sections after the mic, rather than the text title? That way someone considering mics could easily pick out the ones they are considering.
Thanks RachelSweetPea wrote:Could I have sections 12 and 13? I've got two different microphones (though I don't use one of them much )
Thanks!
I really liked the sound of AT2035. I used to have a FocusRite interface - the 2i2. I got rid of it because I simply could not get enough gain out of it. I wonder if one needs a powerful computer to operate these 24 bit interfaces effectively.
Low output seems to be a common problem with some of these USB mics (not the Apogee). I've read numerous complaints about the Samsons as well. I think the Yeti is not a good value for audiobooks. It's a multi-pattern mic, so instead of one good, one-inch capsule, it has three tiny ones, two of which you never use if you have it set to cardioid. A one-third-inch capsule will never give as good a sound as a one inch capsule. Never. It's swell if you're doing a podcast with two speakers; if not, you're spending money on features you will never use at the expense of the one you do. And a small capsule will produce a weaker output.I have heard a couple of negative things about the Yeti Pro:
1) It's output is quite low;
2) The higher bit rates and sampling rates don't really translate to better quality sound.
Thanks Mariacommonsparrow3 wrote:Here are three from me --
Title: Burning Leaves, November
Title: An Open Fire
Title: Morn
Hi RuthRuthieG wrote:I agree about the titles. Let me have a think. We certainly don't need the authors in the title field - they go in the metadata.
Ruth