[COMPLETE] American Psychology 1922-1947 - cm

BellonaTimes · Post by **BellonaTimes** » August 19th, 2011, 6:07 pm

http://upload.librivox.org/share/uploads/cm/americanpsychology2_15.mp3
34:17

CarlManchester · Post by **CarlManchester** » August 20th, 2011, 6:16 am

Thanks BT.

zackpack · Post by **zackpack** » September 1st, 2011, 2:48 am

Hello librivox. i am very very sorry for the delay. my recording should be ready in few days. the problem is there is no high speed connection in my city right now, please excuse me.

CarlManchester · Post by **CarlManchester** » September 4th, 2011, 11:17 am

Okay. Thanks for keeping us up to date.

CarlManchester · Post by **CarlManchester** » January 28th, 2012, 9:54 am

Sorry this project has been held up. This is largely down to me.

I've orphaned two sections, in case anyone is interested in helping to get it back on course.

Cheers,
Carl.

sidhu177 · Post by **sidhu177** » February 12th, 2012, 1:26 am

BC, sign me up for section 6 On Two Types of Conditioned Reflex.

CarlManchester · Post by **CarlManchester** » February 12th, 2012, 4:15 pm

Thanks, I have signed you up.

I did a suggested way of reading the diagrams for this section, which is linked in the MW. However, it is a long time since I did this, so I would like to check it for accuracy. Please hang fire - I will try to do it tomorrow.

Cheers,
Carl.

Post by **TriciaG** » February 14th, 2012, 10:57 am

I'm thinking of claiming the last section to "get 'er done" but have a couple questions:

- Do you want the references read? If so, did you want them read in-line like footnotes, or just as a list at the end (and if just as a list at the end, do I note where the text references them, i.e. read the reference number in-line)?

- Read the tables in this one: yes or no? There are a lot of them.

CarlManchester · Post by **CarlManchester** » February 14th, 2012, 6:34 pm

sidhu177, I've checked the suggested text now, and it seems OK (fingers crossed).

CarlManchester · Post by **CarlManchester** » February 14th, 2012, 6:35 pm

TriciaG wrote:I'm thinking of claiming the last section to "get 'er done" but have a couple questions:

- Do you want the references read? If so, did you want them read in-line like footnotes, or just as a list at the end (and if just as a list at the end, do I note where the text references them, i.e. read the reference number in-line)?

- Read the tables in this one: yes or no? There are a lot of them.

I'll have to get back to you, Tricia. The tables do not seem so straightforward.

Cheers,
Carl.

ppcunningham · Post by **ppcunningham** » March 2nd, 2012, 4:14 pm

CarlManchester wrote:
TriciaG wrote:I'm thinking of claiming the last section to "get 'er done" but have a couple questions:

- Do you want the references read? If so, did you want them read in-line like footnotes, or just as a list at the end (and if just as a list at the end, do I note where the text references them, i.e. read the reference number in-line)?

- Read the tables in this one: yes or no? There are a lot of them.
I'll have to get back to you, Tricia. The tables do not seem so straightforward.

Cheers,
Carl.

I was thinking the same thing Tricia was - but luckily, she beat me to it....

The tables are actually quite straightforward, if you read them down instead of across - and they'd make a great addition to the Insomnia Collection.....

Patti

sidhu177 · Post by **sidhu177** » March 15th, 2012, 7:17 pm

this is regarding section 3: @1:07- "I knew them"- text says "knew them"
@1:33 "early addition to"-text says "early addiction to"
@2:09- "also it "- text says 'also that it'
@2:27- mic disturbance
@9:57 Written: than for the theology;Said: than the theology
@10:43-"there was ...theories"- sentence repeated.
@14:25- "is the"- text says "it is the"
@17:35- "be consumed in" text says "be costumed in"
@19:40- a sudden increase in the volume.

this is regarding section 4: @1:42- 'deduced that the'- text says "deduced the"
@2:36- "found that"- text says "found then that"
@8:26 -"based on a"- text says "based upon a"
@10:23-a paragrah-"Experimental" has been skipped, the next para-"experiment 1" is read.
@15:22-"slight increase for the male group"- text says"slight decrease...."
@17:47-sentence "in thier individual test"-repeated.
@17:54-"Each subject"-text says "Every subject"
@30:37-"RCWDd text"-text says "NCWd text"
@36:59-"conflicting word stimuli"-text says "conflicting color stimuli"
@39:15-"in naming colors"-text says"in naming the colors"
@39:58-"depending on"-text says "depending upon"

this is regarding section 5 : @6:15- "light light is followed by wasy of response"- this sentence is extra.
@35:45- word "but" repeated.

mccoush · Post by **mccoush** » March 15th, 2012, 7:22 pm

sidhu177 (and Carl) - just a note that I have already proof-listened to section 3 (see my notes on page 3 of the discussion board) but I'm sure this second listen-through will be helpful for the reader...

marys44 · Post by **marys44** » March 28th, 2012, 1:48 pm

I was looking at the text, thinking about claiming the section on Abilities of Infants, when I noted that the date on it is 1939. I believe that makes it not public domain. mary s

CarlManchester · Post by **CarlManchester** » April 2nd, 2012, 6:49 am

Hi Mary.

The texts in this selection are all public domain - I checked it out with the copyright holders. The 1939 paper was originally published by Journal Press, who did not renew the copyright as they were supposed to do back in the day. Journal Press works are now owned by Taylor Francis, and I have an email from them confirming that the paper is in the public domain and giving us permission to record.

Cheers,
Carl.