Complete London Labour and the London Poor by Henry Mayhew (1812-1887) - lt
Section 64 (58:40)
https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/londonlabour2_64_mayhew_128kb.mp3
I had a few things noted to edit but they don't seem to be there now, so I'm hoping I did it a couple of weeks ago and just didn't update my list!
https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/londonlabour2_64_mayhew_128kb.mp3
I had a few things noted to edit but they don't seem to be there now, so I'm hoping I did it a couple of weeks ago and just didn't update my list!
It's now getting a bit difficult to read, so I have to 'decode' the missing letters before recording.
I've found the text in Tuft's Digital Library for the parts which I cannot make out on Gutenberg.
(https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tei/tufts:UA069.005.DO.00078/chapter/c8s4)
(https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tei/tufts:UA069.005.DO.00078/chapter/c8s4)
-
- LibriVox Admin Team
- Posts: 33468
- Joined: September 16th, 2012, 7:07 pm
- Location: In the desert
Gill, I've checked with other admins, and we think it is OK to use this text. It is not one of our regular sources.GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 2:35 am I've found the text in Tuft's Digital Library for the parts which I cannot make out on Gutenberg.
(https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tei/tufts:UA069.005.DO.00078/chapter/c8s4)
Tufts ask for a citation for their PD texts, but don't require it.
Thanks. It's just the odd letter or letter combination I can't make out in the original in printed page 364.Lynnet wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 5:19 amGill, I've checked with other admins, and we think it is OK to use this text. It is not one of our regular sources.GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 2:35 am I've found the text in Tuft's Digital Library for the parts which I cannot make out on Gutenberg.
(https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tei/tufts:UA069.005.DO.00078/chapter/c8s4)
Tufts ask for a citation for their PD texts, but don't require it.
Actually, it was only about five words in total.GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 4:54 pmThanks. It's just the odd letter or letter combination I can't make out in the original in printed page 364.Lynnet wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 5:19 amGill, I've checked with other admins, and we think it is OK to use this text. It is not one of our regular sources.GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 2:35 am I've found the text in Tuft's Digital Library for the parts which I cannot make out on Gutenberg.
(https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tei/tufts:UA069.005.DO.00078/chapter/c8s4)
Tufts ask for a citation for their PD texts, but don't require it.