Complete London Labour and the London Poor by Henry Mayhew (1812-1887) - lt

MrsHand · Post by **MrsHand** » October 4th, 2018, 8:50 am

Section 58 has a repeat at 51:08 of "a job directly...a job directly."

Sections 59-61 are PL OK!

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 5th, 2018, 12:52 pm

Section 56 (edited) 53:56

https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/londonlabour2_56_mayhew_128kb.mp3

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 5th, 2018, 2:06 pm

Section 58 edited (51:47)

https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/londonlabour2_58_mayhew_128kb.mp3

MrsHand · Post by **MrsHand** » October 15th, 2018, 12:49 pm

Sections 56, 58, 62, & 63 are all PL OK!

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 16th, 2018, 5:36 pm

Thanks!

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 17th, 2018, 12:58 am

Section 64 (58:40)

https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/londonlabour2_64_mayhew_128kb.mp3

I had a few things noted to edit but they don't seem to be there now, so I'm hoping I did it a couple of weeks ago and just didn't update my list!

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 17th, 2018, 1:38 am

Section 65 (56:25)

https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/londonlabour2_65_mayhew_128kb.mp3

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 19th, 2018, 9:40 am

Section 66 (52:07)

https://librivox.org/uploads/lynnet/londonlabour2_66_mayhew_128kb.mp3

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 20th, 2018, 5:49 am

It's now getting a bit difficult to read, so I have to 'decode' the missing letters before recording.

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 22nd, 2018, 2:35 am

I've found the text in Tuft's Digital Library for the parts which I cannot make out on Gutenberg.
(https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tei/tufts:UA069.005.DO.00078/chapter/c8s4)

Post by **Lynnet** » October 22nd, 2018, 5:19 am

GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 2:35 am I've found the text in Tuft's Digital Library for the parts which I cannot make out on Gutenberg.
(https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tei/tufts:UA069.005.DO.00078/chapter/c8s4)

Gill, I've checked with other admins, and we think it is OK to use this text. It is not one of our regular sources.
Tufts ask for a citation for their PD texts, but don't require it.

MrsHand · Post by **MrsHand** » October 22nd, 2018, 1:01 pm

Sections 63 & 64 are PL OK!

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 22nd, 2018, 4:54 pm

Lynnet wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 5:19 am
GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 2:35 am I've found the text in Tuft's Digital Library for the parts which I cannot make out on Gutenberg.
(https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tei/tufts:UA069.005.DO.00078/chapter/c8s4)
Gill, I've checked with other admins, and we think it is OK to use this text. It is not one of our regular sources.
Tufts ask for a citation for their PD texts, but don't require it.

Thanks. It's just the odd letter or letter combination I can't make out in the original in printed page 364.

GillH · Post by **GillH** » October 22nd, 2018, 4:56 pm

GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 4:54 pm
Lynnet wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 5:19 am
GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 2:35 am I've found the text in Tuft's Digital Library for the parts which I cannot make out on Gutenberg.
(https://dl.tufts.edu/catalog/tei/tufts:UA069.005.DO.00078/chapter/c8s4)
Gill, I've checked with other admins, and we think it is OK to use this text. It is not one of our regular sources.
Tufts ask for a citation for their PD texts, but don't require it.
Thanks. It's just the odd letter or letter combination I can't make out in the original in printed page 364.

Actually, it was only about five words in total.

Post by **Lynnet** » October 22nd, 2018, 5:18 pm

GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 4:56 pm
GillH wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 4:54 pm
Lynnet wrote: ↑October 22nd, 2018, 5:19 am

Gill, I've checked with other admins, and we think it is OK to use this text. It is not one of our regular sources.
Tufts ask for a citation for their PD texts, but don't require it.
Thanks. It's just the odd letter or letter combination I can't make out in the original in printed page 364.
Actually, it was only about five words in total.

At least we know they are 5 PD words