Yeah, I guess that wasn't quite what I meant, but the PL work is less than the sheer volume of an entire play. And I forgot to respond yesterday to the new part in our series. I'll be signing up momentarily; as for the parts (forthcoming minor parts) in the plays, I hope I can depend upon you to help me choose. And I am available for the position of aide de camp. Jim
I know really nothing of Charles Reade, I must admit. But Lucy seems to be an interesting heroine and I'm happy I got to know a bit about his novels this way. Thank you again for an interesting half-hour.
oh wow, now this was difficult to read I mean the dialect the fisher-girls were speaking. You managed quite well not to stumble over it all and to make it intelligible. It sounds like a very adventurous book.
ooh this was a biggie. But George Elliott is fascinating so I can understand that she would receive a big chapter. Very interesting article again, and of course PL ok.
I am not sure. It looks right now, but is 21's PL OK accurate, that is, did you listen or were you unable to. In any case, I am the problem, not you. Jim
neecheelok70 wrote: ↑September 30th, 2018, 6:02 am
I am not sure. It looks right now, but is 21's PL OK accurate, that is, did you listen or were you unable to. In any case, I am the problem, not you. Jim
yes I definitely checked 21, and I made a note of it on this page or the last. And now it's gone from the MW... Must have been a temporary glitch. All looks ok now again.