History Of Sculpture (4 Titles) [Visual Arts/Sculpture]

Suggest and discuss books to read (all languages welcome!)
Post Reply
LectorRecitator
Posts: 73
Joined: October 6th, 2018, 1:34 pm

Post by LectorRecitator » July 15th, 2019, 11:17 am

A History Of Sculpture (1907) by Short, Ernest Henry (1875–1959)

ℹ️ "My justification for the title and, indeed, for the work as a whole, is that I have not attempted to write a new text-book. In my view, all great art is essentially national art. It can therefore only be understood in the light of national and international history. For this reason, I have given much more attention to the artistic interpretation of historical events and social circumstances than most historians of the arts have deemed necessary. Throughout I have written from the standpoint of one who believes that the great schools of sculpture were created, not by individuals of genius, but by the peoples to whom they appealed. A work written on these lines can fairly claim to be "A History of Sculpture."

This general scheme has entailed several consequences. I am conscious that I have dealt curtly with pre-Hellenic art particularly with that of the Mycenaean age. My reason is that ivory work and goldsmithery, by which Mycenaean art can best be illustrated, do not come within the scope of the book. References to such schools as the modern German and the American have been omitted in the belief that they would have added little to the strength of my main argument. For the same reason I have devoted comparatively little space to biographical details concerning individual artists even of the first class and have referred to only the most characteristic of their works.
" (Preface)

https://archive.org/details/historyofsculptu00shorrich/page/n7

https://archive.org/details/historyofsculptu00shoruoft/page/n9

A Text-Book Of The History Of Sculpture (1911, New Edition Revised) by Marquand, Allan (1853–1924) & Frothingham, Arthur Lincoln (1859–1923)

ℹ️ "THE object of this volume is to provide students in schools and colleges with a concise survey of the history of sculpture, so that they may be able to comprehend intelligently the sculpture of the past and the present in the countries with which our own civilization has been and is most intimately connected. It has seemed unnecessary to treat of prehistoric sculpture in general ; its connection with the flow of civilization is at present too remote and ill defined. Nor have we entered upon the history of Saracenic, Indian, Chinese, and Japanese sculpture, although all of these have had some influence on European art. The various phases of Oriental art are, from an historical standpoint, in great measure still a mystery to the Western world. This is equally true of the art of the semi-civilized nations whose influence once spread so widely upon our own hemisphere. That portion of the general history of sculpture which comes within our survey is itself imperfectly known. In some countries it has been easy to trace the general development of the art; in others, the lack of systematic scientific study still hides from us most important treasures." (Preface)

https://archive.org/details/historysculpture00marqiala/page/n7

https://archive.org/details/atextbookhistor01marqgoog/page/n10

A History Of Sculpture (1916) by Fowler, Harold North (1859–1955)

ℹ️ "In this book I have attempted to give a sketch of the history of sculpture from the beginnings of civilization in Egypt and Babylonia to the present day. The sculpture of the Far East is treated very briefly and, as I am perfectly conscious, insufficiently, because it has not affected the development of our own art, but has led a separate existence, in spite of the influence exerted upon it by Greek sculpture. For similar reasons, and also on account of its lack of intrinsic merit, the sculpture of the American aborigines, of the negro races, the tribes of Oceania, and other backward peoples has been altogether omitted. With these limitations, I have tried to include an account of all the important developments in the art of sculpture in ancient, mediaeval, and modern times, with such descriptions of individual works and information concerning individual artists as the space at my disposal and the available information permit. Since the book is a history, not a series of essays, I have attempted no detailed criticism. A brief description of the materials and methods employed in sculpture is contained in the Introduction."(Preface)

https://archive.org/details/cu31924020711044/page/n11

https://archive.org/details/historyofsculptu00fowluoft/page/n10

A History Of European And American Sculpture (1921) by Post, Chandler Rathfon (1881–1959)

ℹ️ "In writing this book I have constantly had in mind, as one of my purposes, the desire to supply the need of a history of the sculpture of our own era that could be put into the hands of students for collateral reading outside of the lecture-room. This need I have experienced in my own classes, and I shall feel that my labor has not been in vain if the two volumes prove to be of any assistance to others in solving one of the many difficult problems that at the present day still confront teachers of the Fine Arts. For the realization of such a purpose it was found necessary to exceed the limits of an ordinary textbook in the length of the introductory discussions of each period and in the detailed treatment of the important sculptural movements and personalities. My intent has been not only to give a comprehensive idea of the various epochs, but also to produce a book of reference in which should be traced the evolution of the several national schools and of the secondary as well as the principal sculptors in those schools and in which their chief works should be catalogued and described. But while I have thus sought to aid the student and to provide even the expert with a convenient companion to his studies, I have never been consciously neglectful of the demands of the general interested public. I have endeavored to make the book readable. It is as elementary and as non-technical as was feasible without boring the serious student; all but a few indispensable notes have been avoided; and the preliminary summaries of each period and of the art of each country in that period have been the objects of hard and special effort." (Preface)

Volume 1: https://archive.org/details/historyofeuropea01post/page/n8

Volume 2: https://archive.org/details/historyofeuropea02post/page/n8

Post Reply