LibriVox Forum

Are you planning on editing the source text document to remove that section? I could on the copy you uploaded, but it entails changing the section numbers on all the following articles, so if you're in there doing other things, you might as well do this, too. What's the point? Can't one just skip a...

Are you planning on editing the source text document to remove that section? I could on the copy you uploaded, but it entails changing the section numbers on all the following articles, so if you're in there doing other things, you might as well do this, too. I’ve updated the MW (Except i haven’t e...

Are you planning on editing the source text document to remove that section? I could on the copy you uploaded, but it entails changing the section numbers on all the following articles, so if you're in there doing other things, you might as well do this, too. I’ve updated the MW (Except i haven’t e...

Note:
I have taken #16 OUT of the line up...the "Fencers" story (A GALA NIGHT AT THE FENCERS-November 21, 1893 )had one mention of Twain...at the bottom, and only as someone who attended....interesting story...but...

16-19 are done

14-15 done

8-13 are done....they're all short!

PL Notes 4 ,5, 6, 7 4 PL OK 5 4:54 3 bump in volume, from 86 to 89, seems abrupt 7:17 from the performance s , s is missing (insignificant in my view) Rumbling at the end. 6 :23 but by John Greenman, should say read 7 2:10 Clemons, you say Mr. Clemons (insignificant in my view but easy to delete) g...

msfry wrote: ↑

January 2nd, 2020, 1:39 pm

Sorry you're feeling under. Bummer for New Years, but that's a common complaint everywhere, it seems. As to the project, go at your own pace. I'm in no rush for clues as to who the murderer is, what room, and what weapon was used.

sorry for my absence ....
I'm currently "under the weather" and wondering "FOR HOW LONG???"

I'm going WAY ahead with the microfiche gathering, in the mean time...but will get back to recording when I get my voice back!!


Happy New Year ALL!!

04 is corrected

6 and 7 are done

One more note on Section 4: 20:38 stumble, but um I wrote to tell him No changes to tempo. If you're satisfied with it, so am I. :wink: The OCR explanation makes sense. It was a surprising lot of errors for an experienced reader to make! So I went back and checked the working thread of Part 2, and ...

Oh...I wont give it away! It was so surprise to me! but I suppose I shouldn’t have been surprised. Thanks for the superb word perfect listening! And thanks for changing the speed of Twain’s reading… However, he did speak very slowly and in the drawl so it probably doesn’t matter if it’s too slow bu...

Oh...I wont give it away! It was so surprise to me! but I suppose I shouldn’t have been surprised. Thanks for the superb word perfect listening! And thanks for changing the speed of Twain’s reading… However he did speak very slowly and in the drawl so it probably doesn’t matter if it’s too slow but ...

got 2 right this time!!
it's UP

Thanks!!