LibriVox Forum

https://librivox.org/uploads/aradlaw/serenade_hood_ww_128kb.mp3 that should be better! Yes, this one passes muster! At 91.8dB (by the measure we use), it's right within the range we need. Marking as "Proof-Listener OK'd", or "PL OK". :thumbs: Oh, but please remember for next tim...

This is my first upload. Please put my name in as Lynn Allen in the catalogue. Thank you Lynn, welcome to LibriVox, and thank you for joining us on this weekly poem! Your volume is good, at just about 87dBs. I see that was a concern, but it will do nicely! Your reading is good, but I'll ask that yo...

Thank you, Agnes.

Thank you, Agnes.

I am West Wood! what a fun little poem, that I TOTALLY did not try for far too long to determine if this was two different characters or one character with an internal dialogue Right!? I'm still not certain on that point, but this was just too fun to pass up. Thank you very much for joining us! :mr...

I am a new reader, enthusiastic and male, therefore suspect in your mind, I'm sure; but I'm not unfamiliar with dramatic readings. Well hello, SubtlySouthern, and welcome to LibriVox! I see that you've posted your "1-minute test", and your recording setup is in order! :mrgreen: I love the...

Well, you beat me to an answer! I'll continue to post this in case it also helps someone. :wink: ---- Perhaps the .5 to 1 is not in the units the waveform meter shows, but in terms of the height of the waveform display itself. If you're looking at the image on this wiki page: https://wiki.librivox.o...

Thank you.

Thank you, Lee Ann.

https://librivox.org/uploads/aradlaw/Serenade_hood_mbs.mp3 by Marilyn And thank you, Marilyn! As this is your first recording for a LibriVox project, I've added you as a reader in our catalog! :mrgreen: You have your own catalog page, which will list any future projects you join. You can find that ...

Craigos wrote: ↑Today, 11:02 am I'm making a real mess of this! I've been uploading to another site today, who's criteria require 256kbs, hence that mistake.

Not at all. Thank you for joining us! Now PL OK.

I am a bit confused about what went wrong here. I run everything past ACX checker and it shows Peak -3db, RMS -19.42 and Noise -61.32. All these meet the criteria for ACX check. Once I have adjusted the amplification by -3 it shows as a fail on ACX check. What system is being used for checking? Thi...

Thank you, Adrian.
Indeed, the opposite!

Craigos wrote: ↑Today, 8:32 am One from me.

Thank you, Craig! Your recording is good, but Checker reports the volume is a little over 92dB. Could I have you Amplify by about -3dB, and re-upload?

LuellaMargaret wrote: ↑Today, 6:10 am I guess I'll start with Chapter 20.

So be it! Chapter 20 is assigned.

silverquill wrote: ↑Yesterday, 10:25 pm Hi, may I snag the preface?

You may! Thank you, Larry.