LibriVox Forum

Looks good! Do put the run times in the Notes field; I use them at cataloging time to be sure the files are transferred okay through the cataloging process.

You will need to put them into the Magic Window. I posted links to instructions on how to do that. Holler if you have questions!

Ha! So many snicker-worthy phrases and thoughts.

PL OK!

Thank you!

Section 8: I'm going to start getting a little more strict in my proof-listening of your sections. :) 1:52 - "never on any account" - pause in this, and "on any account" is much quieter. 2:10 - "enriches himself. The next" - there's absolutely no pause between these sentences. It's better to pause a...

Yes, I can do that. Thank you for letting me know.

I found it in an Archive scanned book, published 1917: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.95756/page/n25/mode/2up

Section 37 is 88:5 dB, section 38 is 87:9 dB and section 40 is 88:2 dB said the checker.
Are those still accettable?

Yes, they're acceptable. I would only mention the volume if it's below 87 (86.9 or lower), and that is being more strict than required.

https://wiki.librivox.org/index.php/CD_Covers#PD_Picture_Sources Gutenberg.org links to http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Main_Page. Update to http://www.gutenberg.org/ VintagePrintable.com links to http://vintageprintable.com/wordpress/. Update to http://vintageprintable.swivelchairmedia.com/ Thanks! ...

If this is a play that you're going to stitch together the parts, you'll need to use the Dramatic Works template. (Instead of Collaborative, choose Dramatic Work.) Unfortunately, you will have to fill in everything in the template over again. We don't have a way to convert the template between the t...

Sounds much better!

All the tests check out. You're all set to record!

49 PL OK!

You can add multiple readers to one section using their reader numbers, separated by a comma: 1234,3157,4226 into the reader name field. But then, you'll have to know their reader numbers to do that. EDIT: I do not know if you could add the same multiple readers to more than one section using this m...

Probably because the BC forgot to put a tilde into the subject line. That's my guess. It's not automatic, and it's prone to human error.

Thank you! I have you in for 56.