EVERYTHING related to LibriVox: our forums, the catalog, the database in the background, the website... is stored on archive's servers.
I'm pretty sure I know what Anne means, but it's not on me to answer this question.Second, what is the "ocean full of sharks" comment?
I understand that you are donating to archive. Thank you.Third, is IA complaining about a lack of storage space? Have we approached them about how much storage LV can use? Are we limiting ourselves needlessly?
However, no matter the tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars you are personally contributing, LibriVox is still a GUEST on archive's servers. The archive team has done many things over the years to accommodate the needs we have. I would consider it extremely rude to push for things that are not absolutely necessary to the proper functioning of LibriVox.
See my answer to "First" above.Fourth, why can't we store the 600 x 600 images on LV servers [snip]
I am pretty sure I know what you're insinuating here, and I find your comment rude.Fifth, is Anne's the only voice allowed to weigh in here? From her comments above, it seems so.
We have discussed this and all of us admins are pretty much on the same page with this, there is no need to hear from different mouths what you are not willing to accept from a single one.
I understand that you enjoy making the covers for our projects as do many others, and I agree that it's nice to have "window dressing" so to speak to make our pages more appealing to the casual scroller-by.
However, pushing for something that looks good on somebody's personal youtube channel is nothing more than dressing SOMEBODY ELSE'S WINDOWS. There are hundreds, if not thousands of windows out there that display LibriVox content (and that's great), however, I don't see how making THEM look pretty should be any of our concern.